skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?

Hilgert, Leandro A ; de Amorim, Rodrigo G ; Leal, Soraya C ; Mulder, Jan ; Creugers, Nico H.J ; Frencken, Jo E

Dental materials, 2014-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1172-1178 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Elsevier Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Is high-viscosity glass-ionomer-cement a successor to amalgam for treating primary molars?
  • Autor: Hilgert, Leandro A ; de Amorim, Rodrigo G ; Leal, Soraya C ; Mulder, Jan ; Creugers, Nico H.J ; Frencken, Jo E
  • Assuntos: Advanced Basic Science ; Analysis of variance ; Atraumatic restorative treatment ; Child ; Children ; Dental Amalgam ; Dental amalgams ; Dentin ; Dentistry ; Design engineering ; Glass ionomer cement ; Glass Ionomer Cements ; Humans ; Molar ; Primary teeth ; Regression ; Restoration ; Restorations ; Restorative care ; Survival ; Survival analysis ; Viscosity
  • É parte de: Dental materials, 2014-10, Vol.30 (10), p.1172-1178
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-News-1
    ObjectType-Feature-3
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Article-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
  • Descrição: Abstract Objectives To assess and compare the cumulative survival rate of amalgam and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations in primary molars over 3 years. Methods 280 children aged 6–7 years old were enrolled in a cluster randomized controlled clinical trial using a parallel group design covering two treatment groups: conventional restorative treatment with amalgam (CRT) and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using a high-viscosity glass-ionomer (HVGIC) Ketac Molar Easymix. Three pedodontists placed 750 restorations (364 amalgam and 386 ART in 126 and 154 children, respectively) which were evaluated at 0.5, 1, 2 and 3 years. The proportional hazard rate regression model with frailty correction, ANOVA and Wald tests, and the Jackknife procedure were applied in analysing the data. Results The cumulative survival rates over 3 years for all, single- and multiple-surface CRT/amalgam restorations (72.6%, 93.4%, 64.7%, respectively) were no different from those of comparable ART/HVGIC restorations (66.8%; 90.1% and 56.4%, respectively) ( p = 0.10). Single-surface restorations had higher survival rates than multiple-surface restorations for the both treatment procedures ( p < 0.0001). A higher proportion of restorations failed because of mechanical reasons (94.8%) than of secondary caries (5.2%). No difference in reasons for restoration failures between all types of amalgam and ART/HVGIC restorations were observed ( p = 0.24). Significance The high-viscosity glass-ionomer used in this study in conjunction with the ART is a viable option for restoring carious dentin lesions in single surfaces in vital primary molars.
  • Editor: England: Elsevier Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.