skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search prefilters
Busca Simples

Lightweight Software Architecture Evaluation for Industry: A Comprehensive Review

Sahlabadi, Mahdi ; Muniyandi, Ravie Chandren ; Shukur, Zarina ; Qamar, Faizan

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-02, Vol.22 (3), p.1252 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Switzerland: MDPI AG

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Lightweight Software Architecture Evaluation for Industry: A Comprehensive Review
  • Autor: Sahlabadi, Mahdi ; Muniyandi, Ravie Chandren ; Shukur, Zarina ; Qamar, Faizan
  • Assuntos: Architecture ; Computer architecture ; Data mining ; heavyweight software architecture ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Herniorrhaphy ; Humans ; Industry ; Internet of Things ; Investment analysis ; Lightweight ; lightweight software architecture ; Literature reviews ; Researchers ; Review ; Software ; software architectural evaluation ; software quality ; Surgical Mesh ; Trends
  • É parte de: Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022-02, Vol.22 (3), p.1252
  • Notas: SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-4
    ObjectType-Undefined-1
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Review-2
    ObjectType-Article-3
  • Descrição: Processes for evaluating software architecture (SA) help to investigate problems and potential risks in SA. It is derived from many studies that proposed a plethora of systematic SA evaluation methods, while industrial practitioners currently refrain from applying them since they are heavyweight. Nowadays, heterogeneous software architectures are organized based on the new infrastructure. Hardware and associated software allow different systems, such as embedded, sensor-based, modern AI, and cloud-based systems, to cooperate efficiently. It brings more complexities to SA evaluation. Alternatively, lightweight architectural evaluation methods have been proposed to satisfy the practitioner's concerns, but practitioners still do not adopt these methods. This study employs a systematic literature review with a text analysis of SA's definitions to propose a comparison framework for SA. It identifies lightweight features and factors to improve the architectural evaluation methods among industrial practitioners. The features are determined based on the practitioner's concerns by analyzing the architecture's definitions from stakeholders and reviewing architectural evaluation methods. The lightweight factors are acquired by studying the five most commonly used lightweight methods and the Architecture-based Tradeoff Analysis Method (ATAM), the most well-known heavyweight method. Subsequently, the research addresses these features and factors.
  • Editor: Switzerland: MDPI AG
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  8 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.