Idioma:

KEY OR CLOSURE? THE LEARNED LEGAL DEBATE ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MODERATING POWER/CHAVE OU FECHO? O DEBATE JURIDICO ERUDITO SOBRE A RESPONSABILIDADE DO PODER MODERADOR

Guandalini, Walter, Jr

Quaestio iuris, 2016-05, Vol.9 (2), p.1031 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
KEY OR CLOSURE? THE LEARNED LEGAL DEBATE ON THE RESPONSIBILITY OF MODERATING POWER/CHAVE OU FECHO? O DEBATE JURIDICO ERUDITO SOBRE A RESPONSABILIDADE DO PODER MODERADOR
Autor: Guandalini, Walter, Jr
É parte de: Quaestio iuris, 2016-05, Vol.9 (2), p.1031
Descrição: This study addresses the legal debates that took place in the second half of the nineteenth century about the legal responsibility of the moderating power. By doing an archaeological analysis of the structure and content of the arguments used, it aims to understand the rules that make up the discursive order within which the debate develops, and which have inspired the complex process of brazilian legal discourse modernization after the country's independence. It concludes that differences among jurists of the period are not only political or hermeneutical, but also reflect the contrast between two different conceptions of law: a rational-realist one, which sees law as a set of necessary relationships drawn from the spirit of constitutional order; and a legal-formalist one, which sees law as a set of positive norms textually formalized on the constitution.
Editor: Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj
Idioma: Espanhol

Voltar para lista de resultados