skip to main content
Idioma:

66:oral Citizens’ rationales about health technologies and services that should be prioritized to be publicly funded by the Colombian health system

Vélez, M ; Díaz-Hernández, DP ; Patiño-Lugo, DF ; Salazar-Blanco, OF ; Velásquez-Salazar, P ; González-Arango, JE ; Pérez-Gutiérrez, AM ; Vera-Giraldo, CY ; Velásquez, JC ; Granda-Ferro, JS ; Rodríguez-Corredor, LC ; Arboleda-Taborda, JG ; Vélez-Marín, VM ; Montoya-Montoya, GJ

BMJ global health, 2022-04, Vol.7 (Suppl 2), p.A25-A25 [Periódico revisado por pares]

London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    66:oral Citizens’ rationales about health technologies and services that should be prioritized to be publicly funded by the Colombian health system
  • Autor: Vélez, M ; Díaz-Hernández, DP ; Patiño-Lugo, DF ; Salazar-Blanco, OF ; Velásquez-Salazar, P ; González-Arango, JE ; Pérez-Gutiérrez, AM ; Vera-Giraldo, CY ; Velásquez, JC ; Granda-Ferro, JS ; Rodríguez-Corredor, LC ; Arboleda-Taborda, JG ; Vélez-Marín, VM ; Montoya-Montoya, GJ
  • Assuntos: Abstracts ; Citizen participation ; Global health ; Health care access ; Medical technology ; Priorities ; Public opinion ; Public services
  • É parte de: BMJ global health, 2022-04, Vol.7 (Suppl 2), p.A25-A25
  • Notas: Abstracts of the 13th International Society for Priorities in Health Conference, Bergen, Norway, 28–30 April 2022
  • Descrição: BackgroundCitizen participation in health policy decision-making is an issue of global interest. In Colombia, since 2015, a law ordered the Ministry of Health to establish a technical-scientific and participatory procedure to determine services and technologies that should not be publicly funded. The objective of this research was to explore and understand what factors and rationales influence Colombian citizens’ perceptions about which technologies and services should be prioritized to be publicly funded?MethodsA sequential mixed-methods study. In the qualitative case study, we collected information through semi-structured interviews with 46 citizens belonging to five groups (i.e., plain citizens, patients, health workers, healthcare managers, and health policymakers). Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed, with thematic analysis conducted of all transcripts.ResultsEight themes explain the citizens’ rationale to prioritize health technologies or services that the Colombian health system should publicly fund. Those were: 1) coverage depends on the socio-economic conditions of the person; 2) prioritize technologies supported by evidence of efficacy; 3) coverage should depend on the patient‘s necessity and prescription of the doctor; 4) technologies or services that improve quality of life should be publicly funded; 5) coverage depends on the vulnerability of the person; 6) instead of general rules about inclusion/exclusion, each case need to be analyzed; 7) all technologies and services should be covered because is better spend the money in patients needs than in corruption, and 8) all technologies and services should be covered and the health systems should not consider any exclusion.ConclusionWe identified that citizens’ rationales to prioritize technologies to be publicly funded depend on the patient‘s characteristics, type of disease, type of technology, and features of the health system. Those arguments and rationales for prioritization are coupled and founded on discussions about social justice from egalitarian, utilitarian and Rawlsian approaches.
  • Editor: London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.