skip to main content
Idioma:

OF ACTIVISM FOR JUDICIAL EXTREMISM IN PUBLIC PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE POLICIES/DO ATIVISMO PARA O EXTREMISMO JUDICIAL NAS POLITICAS PUBLICAS DE ASSISTENCIA FARMACEUTICA

Carneiro, Debora Ferreira

Revista de Direito Brasileira, 2018-05, Vol.20, p.448 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Universidade Nove de Julho

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    OF ACTIVISM FOR JUDICIAL EXTREMISM IN PUBLIC PHARMACEUTICAL ASSISTANCE POLICIES/DO ATIVISMO PARA O EXTREMISMO JUDICIAL NAS POLITICAS PUBLICAS DE ASSISTENCIA FARMACEUTICA
  • Autor: Carneiro, Debora Ferreira
  • Assuntos: Activism ; Budgets ; Constitutional law ; Decision making ; Executive power ; Human rights ; Judges ; Judicial activism ; Judicial opinions ; Medical societies ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Physicians ; Public finance ; Separation of powers ; Social aspects ; Social justice
  • É parte de: Revista de Direito Brasileira, 2018-05, Vol.20, p.448
  • Descrição: The basis of constitutional states lies in the separation of powers. With the evolution of modern states, from the theories of neo-constitutionalism, the separation became more fluid, with the objective of giving greater effectiveness to the fundamental rights guaranteed in the constitution. From that moment, the Judiciary leaves the initial inertia and gains strength in more effective decisions. Judicial advocacy, called judicial activism, can be an important mechanism for citizens to protect their rights against legislative inertia and executive bureaucracy. However, judges when they exceed in the decision-making power, can disrespect the tripartition of powers. This movement of judicial extremism is detrimental to the Democratic State of Law. It is easy to see these extreme positions in relation to public policies related to the right to health. The State, an extremist judge, disrespects public policies, disrespects the public budget, disrespects the rights of the community and imposes obligations on the Administration, without evaluating the consequences and without generating effective social justice. In relation to public policies related to pharmaceutical assistance, the Public Administration accumulates successive judicial defeats, since almost all requests for the supply of medicines are granted. Behavior that has become widespread in the country. Who profits most is the pharmaceutical industry, which ensures an open consumer market, free of questioning and profitable, with judicial decisions. A broad dialogue is needed between the judiciary, the public administration, physicians, control bodies and civil society so that fundamental rights are efficiently and guaranteed
  • Editor: Universidade Nove de Julho
  • Idioma: Português
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.