skip to main content
Idioma:
Resultados 1 2 3 4 5 next page
Refinado por: nível superior: Revistas revisadas por pares remover
Result Number Material Type Add to My Shelf Action Record Details and Options
1
Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects
Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects

Persson, Hans ; åhman, Henrik ; Yngling, Alexander Arvei ; Gulliksen, Jan

Universal access in the information society, 2015-11, Vol.14 (4), p.505-526 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
2
THE DESIGN OF EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
THE DESIGN OF EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

THE DESIGN OF EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Jeavons, Peter

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1051-1068 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
3
AN EVALUATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL CASE FOR DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
AN EVALUATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL CASE FOR DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

AN EVALUATION OF THE BIOLOGICAL CASE FOR DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Glass, David H.

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1024-1036 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
4
RESPONSE: THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
RESPONSE: THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

RESPONSE: THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Kojonen, Erkki V. R.

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1108-1123 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
5
EVOLUTION, CHANCE, NECESSITY, AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
EVOLUTION, CHANCE, NECESSITY, AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

EVOLUTION, CHANCE, NECESSITY, AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Alexander, Denis R.

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1069-1082 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
6
DIVINE DESIGN AND EVOLUTIONARY EVIL: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
DIVINE DESIGN AND EVOLUTIONARY EVIL: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

DIVINE DESIGN AND EVOLUTIONARY EVIL: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Wahlberg, Mats

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1095-1107 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
7
THE CONTENTIOUS COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK SYMPOSIUM: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
THE CONTENTIOUS COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK SYMPOSIUM: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

THE CONTENTIOUS COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: INTRODUCTION TO THE BOOK SYMPOSIUM: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Ardern, Zachary

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1019-1023 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
8
RESPONSE TO THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
RESPONSE TO THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

RESPONSE TO THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Sollereder, Bethany N.

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1083-1094 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
9
THOMIST OR TUMBLRIST: COMMENTS ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN BY E. V. R. KOJONEN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
THOMIST OR TUMBLRIST: COMMENTS ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN BY E. V. R. KOJONEN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

THOMIST OR TUMBLRIST: COMMENTS ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN BY E. V. R. KOJONEN: with Zachary Ardern, “The Contentious Compatibility of Evolution and Design: Introduction to the Book Symposium”; David H. Glass, “An Evaluation of the Biological Case for Design”; Meghan D. Page, “Thomist or Tumblrist: Comments on The Compatibility of Evolution and Design by E. V. R. Kojonen”; Peter Jeavons, “The Design of Evolutionary Algorithms: A Computer Science Perspective on the Compatibility of Evolution and Design”; Denis R. Alexander, “Evolution, Chance, Necessity, and Design”; Bethany

Page, Meghan D.

Zygon, 2022-12, Vol.57 (4), p.1037-1050 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
10
Design
Design
Material Type:
Artigo 		Adicionar ao Meu Espaço

Design

Cayley Guimarães ; Leandro Augusto Ferras dos Santos ; Isabela Mantovani Fontana, M.Sc

Design e Tecnologia, 2017-12, Vol.7 (14), p.11-29 [Periódico revisado por pares]

PGDesign/UFRGS

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
Resultados 1 2 3 4 5 next page

Personalize Seus Resultados

  1. Editar

Refine Search Results

Expandir Meus Resultados

  1.   

Refinar Meus Resultados

Tipo de Recurso 

  1. Artigos  (5.674.267)
  2. Resenhas  (182.459)
  3. Anais de Congresso  (48.754)
  4. Book Chapters  (27.323)
  5. magazinearticle  (8.258)
  6. Livros  (1.435)
  7. Web Resources  (344)
  8. Dissertações  (168)
  9. Conjunto de Dados  (71)
  10. Imagens  (50)
  11. Reports  (17)
  12. Newsletter Articles  (9)
  13. Newspapers  (8)
  14. Recursos Textuais  (7)
  15. Verbetes  (1)
  16. Mais opções open sub menu

Assunto 

  1. Science & Technology  (3.768.512)
  2. Technology  (1.795.334)
  3. Life Sciences & Biomedicine  (1.666.631)
  4. Humans  (1.081.906)
  5. Engineering  (1.075.864)
  6. Physical Sciences  (964.378)
  7. Female  (573.509)
  8. Social Sciences  (563.060)
  9. Male  (507.055)
  10. Chemistry  (446.242)
  11. Engineering, Electrical & Electronic  (390.236)
  12. Exact Sciences And Technology  (389.184)
  13. Physics  (383.356)
  14. Materials Science  (382.974)
  15. Computer Science  (364.622)
  16. Biological And Medical Sciences  (352.487)
  17. Adult  (347.659)
  18. Middle Aged  (305.096)
  19. Applied Sciences  (294.743)
  20. Materials Science, Multidisciplinary  (290.664)
  21. Mais opções open sub menu

Data de Publicação 

De até
Refinar
  1. Antes de1959  (12.559)
  2. 1959Até1974  (43.584)
  3. 1975Até1990  (175.405)
  4. 1991Até2007  (1.213.132)
  5. Após 2007  (4.501.958)
  6. Mais opções open sub menu

Idioma 

  1. Inglês  (5.783.537)
  2. Japonês  (426.081)
  3. Espanhol  (52.043)
  4. Português  (45.598)
  5. Alemão  (27.930)
  6. Francês  (24.515)
  7. Chinês  (12.571)
  8. Coreano  (10.633)
  9. Russo  (10.578)
  10. Indonésio  (9.395)
  11. Persa  (8.554)
  12. Árabe  (5.559)
  13. Turco  (5.302)
  14. Italiano  (3.329)
  15. Norueguês  (3.193)
  16. Catalão  (1.925)
  17. Polonês  (1.501)
  18. Tcheco  (1.208)
  19. Esloveno  (1.068)
  20. Africâner  (1.047)
  21. Mais opções open sub menu

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.