Idioma:

Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA

Leclercq, Victoria ; Beaudart, Charlotte ; Ajamieh, Sara ; Rabenda, Véronique ; Tirelli, Ezio ; Bruyère, Olivier

Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-11, Vol.115, p.46-54 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Elsevier Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA
Autor: Leclercq, Victoria ; Beaudart, Charlotte ; Ajamieh, Sara ; Rabenda, Véronique ; Tirelli, Ezio ; Bruyère, Olivier
Assuntos: Bias ; Completeness ; Epidemiology ; Funding ; Guideline Adherence ; Hirsch index ; Human health sciences ; Humans ; Impact factors ; Information sources ; Internal Medicine ; Journal Impact Factor ; Librarians ; Meta-analysis ; Meta-Analysis as Topic ; Meta-research ; Open access ; PRISMA statement ; Psychology ; Public health, health care sciences & services ; Publishing - standards ; Reporting ; Research Design - standards ; Researchers ; Santé publique, services médicaux & soins de santé ; Sciences de la santé humaine ; Sciences sociales & comportementales, psychologie ; Social & behavioral sciences, psychology ; Studies ; Supervision ; Systematic review ; Visualization ; Writing
É parte de: Journal of clinical epidemiology, 2019-11, Vol.115, p.46-54
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
scopus-id:2-s2.0-85069829859
Descrição: AbstractObjectivesTo investigate the effect of the explicit mention of PRISMA, a statement designed to help authors report meta-analyses (MAs), on the reporting completeness of MAs. Study Design and SettingTwo investigators evaluated a random sample of 206 MAs indexed in PsycINFO in 2016; 100 explicitly mentioned PRISMA and 106 did not. Two authors independently evaluated the 27 PRISMA items and extracted factors that could potentially be associated with reporting completeness. The data were analyzed descriptively. ResultsAmong our 206 MAs, perfect adherence to PRISMA was found in less than 4%, of which 87% explicitly followed PRISMA. The following items were encountered significantly more frequently in MAs that explicitly mentioned PRISMA than in those that did not: summary, protocol, information sources, search strategy, study characteristics, results of individual studies, funding, study selection, risk of bias in individual studies, and bias across studies. The journal's impact factor, endorsement of PRISMA by the journal, number of authors, country of author, open access, and design of the included studies were significantly and positively associated with the explicit mention of PRISMA. ConclusionsEven if far from optimal, the explicit mention of PRISMA has a positive influence on the reporting completeness of MAs from PsycINFO.
Editor: United States: Elsevier Inc
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 3 Avançar Ir para próxima página

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Meta-analyses indexed in PsycINFO had a better completeness of reporting when they mention PRISMA

Leclercq, Victoria ; Beaudart, Charlotte ; Ajamieh, Sara ; Rabenda, Véronique ; Tirelli, Ezio ; Bruyère, Olivier

United States: Elsevier Inc

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.