skip to main content
Idioma:

Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time

Appleford, Gabrielle ; Mumbia, Daniel ; Emmart, Priya

Gates open research, 2022-01, Vol.6, p.124-124 [Periódico revisado por pares]

London, UK: F1000 Research Limited

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time
  • Autor: Appleford, Gabrielle ; Mumbia, Daniel ; Emmart, Priya
  • Assuntos: eng ; family planning ; Health information policy ; private sector
  • É parte de: Gates open research, 2022-01, Vol.6, p.124-124
  • Notas: new_version
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
    No competing interests were disclosed.
  • Descrição: Background: This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya’s health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration in Nairobi County. Methods: The study used mixed methods drawing on analysis from the KHIS and surveys, complemented by desk review. The qualitative research entailed group discussions with public sector personnel while more in-depth qualitative interviews were done with public and private sector respondents. A framework matrix was developed for the qualitative analysis. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health in March 2022 and conducted over the period March - May 2022.  Results: From a governance lens, private sector respondents recognised the importance of registry and reporting as a government policy requirement. From a procedural lens, private sector respondents saw reporting procedures as duplicative and parallel processes as reports are not generated through digitised information systems. From a technical lens, private sector reporting rates have improved over time however other data quality issues remain, which include over- and under-reporting of family planning services into KHIS. Secondary analysis for Nairobi County shows that the private facility contribution to family planning has declined over time while family planning access through pharmacies have grown over the same period; there is no visibility on this shift within the KHIS. Changes in private sector family service provision have implications for assumptions underpinning modern contraceptive modelled estimates and programmatic decision-making. Conclusions: There is limited monitoring of the incentives and disincentives for reporting by private health facilities into the KHIS. These have changed over time and place. Sustained private sector engagement is important to align incentives for reporting as is greater visibility on the role of pharmacies in family planning.
  • Editor: London, UK: F1000 Research Limited
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.