Idioma:

Biopolymers for dye removal via foam separation

Groß, M. ; Tupinamba Lima, M. ; Uhlig, M. ; Ebraheme, A. ; Roeber, O. ; Olschewski, B. ; von Klitzing, R. ; Schomäcker, R. ; Schwarze, M.

Separation and purification technology, 2017-11, Vol.188, p.451-457 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
Biopolymers for dye removal via foam separation
Autor: Groß, M. ; Tupinamba Lima, M. ; Uhlig, M. ; Ebraheme, A. ; Roeber, O. ; Olschewski, B. ; von Klitzing, R. ; Schomäcker, R. ; Schwarze, M.
Assuntos: Biopolymer ; Dye ; Foam flotation ; SDS
É parte de: Separation and purification technology, 2017-11, Vol.188, p.451-457
Descrição: •Biopolymers are used for foam flotation.•Cationic dyes can be removed with removal efficiencies above 96%.•Biopolymers are comparable to SDS but less water is needed to stabilize the foam.•Anionic dye MO can be removed after adding DTAB as cationic collector. Two commercially available biopolymers are investigated as an alternative to classical surfactants in dye removal via foam flotation. Cationic dyes can be removed with efficiencies above 96% and enrichment factors in the foam of about 6. In comparison to the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), dye removal is slightly lower, but less water is needed to stabilize the foam. The removal efficiency of anionic dyes, e.g. methylene orange, with the pure biopolymer is low (about 5%) but increases significantly (up to 70%) in the presence of a cationic collector, e.g. dodecyltrimethylammonium bromide (DTAB). These results show that we can replace the classical surfactant by a more environmentally friendly alternative.
Editor: Elsevier B.V
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados