skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Lie Detection: What Works?
Brennen, Tim ; Magnussen, Svein
Current directions in
psychological
science : a journal of the American
Psychological
Society, 2023-10, Vol.32 (5), p.395-401
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
Texto completo disponível
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Lie Detection: What Works?
Autor:
Brennen, Tim
;
Magnussen, Svein
É parte de:
Current directions in
psychological
science : a journal of the American
Psychological
Society, 2023-10, Vol.32 (5), p.395-401
Descrição:
A reliable lie-detection method would be extremely useful in many situations but especially in forensic contexts. This review describes and evaluates the range of methods that have been studied. Humans are barely able to pick up lies on the basis of nonverbal cues; they do so more successfully with systematic methodologies that analyze verbal cues and with physiological and neuroscientific methods. However, the rates at which people are able to detect lies are still well below the legal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This means that the utmost caution must be exercised when such methods are employed. In investigations where independent evidence exists, there is emerging evidence that interviews based on a free account followed by the gradual introduction of the evidence by investigators can reveal inconsistencies in a guilty interviewee’s account. Automated machine-learning methods also hold some promise.
Editor:
Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications
Idioma:
Inglês;Norueguês
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Anterior
Resultado
10
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope%3A(USP_PRODUCAO)%2Cscope%3A(USP_EBOOKS)%2Cscope%3A(%22PRIMO%22)%2Cscope%3A(USP)%2Cscope%3A(USP_EREVISTAS)%2Cscope%3A(USP_FISICO)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript