skip to main content

Place-Based and Race-Based Exclusion from Mortgage Loans: Evidence from Three Cities in the Netherlands

Aalbers, Manuel B.

Journal of urban affairs, 2007-02, Vol.29 (1), p.1-29 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Malden, USA: Routledge

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Place-Based and Race-Based Exclusion from Mortgage Loans: Evidence from Three Cities in the Netherlands
  • Autor: Aalbers, Manuel B.
  • Assuntos: Bank loans - Decision-making ; Business ; Cities ; Discrimination - Netherlands ; Discrimination in housing ; Economic behaviour. Consumption ; Economic sociology ; Economics ; Fair lending ; Hague, Netherlands ; Immigration ; Insurance policies ; Loans ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Mortgages ; Mortgages - Decisions ; Race ; Real estate agents & brokers ; Redlining ; Rotterdam, Netherlands ; Sociology ; Sociology and Anthropology ; Sociology of economy and development
  • É parte de: Journal of urban affairs, 2007-02, Vol.29 (1), p.1-29
  • Notas: istex:D043B665EBC336E48F5F0D7E7360217ED967A628
    ark:/67375/WNG-2RRXLZVS-K
    ArticleID:JUAF320
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Do place and race matter in mortgage loan applications? This article presents evidence from mortgage markets in the Dutch cities of Arnhem, The Hague, and Rotterdam, suggesting that place, and to a lesser extent also race, do matter. In general, race and place are not factors of direct exclusion, but (1) zip codes are included in credit scoring systems, and (2) both place and race are significant factors in the assessments by loan officers because applicants who do not meet all formal criteria are more often accepted ("overrides") for indigenous Dutch and low-risk neighborhoods than for ethnic minorities and high-risk neighborhoods. In addition, a "national mortgage guarantee" is compulsory for loan applications in high-risk neighborhoods and thereby used as a substitute for redlining, comparable to the compulsoriness of private mortgage insurance in the United States. Some lenders also engage in direct redlining by rejecting low-risk "national mortgage guarantee" loans in high-risk neighborhoods, a practice potentially explained by transaction cost economizing. Since the high-risk neighborhoods in all three cities accommodate relatively large shares of ethnic minority groups, they are hit twice: through place-based and through race-based exclusion. In other words, place-based disparate treatment results in race-based disparate impact. The neighborhood does matter; place-based exclusion in the mortgage market has a neighborhood effect.
  • Editor: Malden, USA: Routledge
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.