skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences - a scoping review

Edvardsen Tonheim, Live ; Molin, Marianne ; Brevik, Asgeir ; Wøhlk Gundersen, Malene ; Garnweidner-Holme, Lisa

Medical education online, 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.2341508-2341508 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Taylor & Francis

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher education within health sciences - a scoping review
  • Autor: Edvardsen Tonheim, Live ; Molin, Marianne ; Brevik, Asgeir ; Wøhlk Gundersen, Malene ; Garnweidner-Holme, Lisa
  • Assuntos: Communication ; community of inquiry framework ; Databases, Factual ; Health Education ; health science ; higher education ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Medicine ; online education ; Online group work ; Review
  • É parte de: Medical education online, 2024-12, Vol.29 (1), p.2341508-2341508
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-3
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Review-1
    ObjectType-Undefined-4
  • Descrição: In health education, group work is essential to prepare students for working in health care and medical teams. Following the widespread adoption of online teaching, group work increasingly takes place in online environments. Although successful group work can provide good learning outcomes, it is unclear what facilitates or hinders online group work in health science education, and to what extent this topic has been addressed. Thus, this scoping review aimed to identify the facilitators and barriers to online group work in higher health education, provide an overview of the scientific literature related to the topic, and identify knowledge gaps in the research. This scoping review was guided by the methodological framework described by Arksey and O'Malley, and reporting is in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Extension for Scoping Review (PRISMA-ScR). Eight online databases were searched for scientific articles published between 2012 and 2022. At least two researchers independently screened records and full-text articles and charted data including article characteristics and key information related to the research question. Findings were categorized and summarized based on the Community of Inquiry Framework. After screening 3671 records and 466 full-text articles, 39 articles met the inclusion criteria. The review revealed smaller group size, consistency in group composition and joint responsibility to be facilitators. Challenges with group communication, scheduling synchronous meetings and technical issues were identified as barriers. Our findings supported the importance of all three elements of the Community of Inquiry Framework: social, cognitive, and teaching presence. This review provides an overview of facilitators and barriers to online group work in health science education. However, there is a need for further investigation of these factors and studies addressing this topic from the teachers' perspective.
  • Editor: United States: Taylor & Francis
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.