skip to main content
Idioma:

Biased Outcome reporting Guidelines for Underwhelming Studies (BOGUS) statement and checklist

Bauer, Greta R

BMJ (Online), 2021-12, Vol.375, p.e067350-e067350 [Periódico revisado por pares]

London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Biased Outcome reporting Guidelines for Underwhelming Studies (BOGUS) statement and checklist
  • Autor: Bauer, Greta R
  • Assuntos: Bias ; Biomedical research ; Check lists ; Delphi method ; Feature ; Medical research ; Pandemics ; Peer review
  • É parte de: BMJ (Online), 2021-12, Vol.375, p.e067350-e067350
  • Notas: Christmas 2021: Get Lucky
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Introduction That most published research findings are wrong is not only a published argument, but one frequently cited and tweeted.1 To remedy this, more than 400 different sets of research reporting guidelines have been created and compiled through the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) network in an effort to improve reporting, and thus peer review and evaluation of validity of research findings.2 More than 100 additional guidelines are under development.3 So many guidelines exist that there are now guidelines on how to produce guidelines.4 Despite this abundance of guidance, a large lacuna has somehow been allowed to persist. “Publish or perish” promotes inaccuracy in science,8 and may drive medical researchers to publish in predatory journals.9 Ultimately, a lack of high profile publications may lead to defectum vitae—career failure—and such failure has long been known to have adverse impacts on health,10 including perishment.11 Promoting the health of medical researchers through ensuring publication is an intervention that has not—to our knowledge—been considered, but underscores the urgent importance of these reporting guidelines. Implementation and BOGUS components Commonly used guidelines such as CONSORT6 and STARD7 provide researchers with a flow diagram template (to document inclusion and exclusion in the sample) and a checklist (for reporting hypotheses, methods, results, and limitations).
  • Editor: London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.