Idioma:

Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature

Marsh, Kevin ; Lanitis, Tereza ; Neasham, David ; Orfanos, Panagiotis ; Caro, Jaime

PharmacoEconomics, 2014-04, Vol.32 (4), p.345-365 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature
Autor: Marsh, Kevin ; Lanitis, Tereza ; Neasham, David ; Orfanos, Panagiotis ; Caro, Jaime
Assuntos: Advantages ; Bibliometrics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Decision analysis ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Delivery of Health Care - economics ; Delivery of Health Care - organization & administration ; Disadvantages ; Economy. Management ; Evaluation ; Health Administration ; Health and social institutions ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Health Economics ; Health technology assessment ; Humans ; Intervention ; Literature reviews ; Medical sciences ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Methods ; Multiple criteria decision making ; Pharmacoeconomics and Health Outcomes ; Prescription drugs ; Public Health ; Public health. Hygiene ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; Quality of Life Research ; Reimbursement Mechanisms ; Review Article ; Risk assessment ; Studies
É parte de: PharmacoEconomics, 2014-04, Vol.32 (4), p.345-365
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
Descrição: The objective of this study is to support those undertaking a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) by reviewing the approaches adopted in healthcare MCDAs to date, how these varied with the objective of the study, and the lessons learned from this experience. Searches of EMBASE and MEDLINE identified 40 studies that provided 41 examples of MCDA in healthcare. Data were extracted on the objective of the study, methods employed, and decision makers’ and study authors’ reflections on the advantages and disadvantages of the methods. The recent interest in MCDA in healthcare is mirrored in an increase in the application of MCDA to evaluate healthcare interventions. Of the studies identified, the first was published in 1990, but more than half were published since 2011. They were undertaken in 18 different countries, and were designed to support investment (coverage and reimbursement), authorization, prescription, and research funding allocation decisions. Many intervention types were assessed: pharmaceuticals, public health interventions, screening, surgical interventions, and devices. Most used the value measurement approach and scored performance using predefined scales. Beyond these similarities, a diversity of different approaches were adopted, with only limited correspondence between the approach and the type of decision or product. Decision makers consulted as part of these studies, as well as the authors of the studies are positive about the potential of MCDA to improve decision making. Further work is required, however, to develop guidance for those undertaking MCDA.
Editor: Cham: Springer International Publishing
Idioma: Inglês

Links

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Assessing the Value of Healthcare Interventions Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis: A Review of the Literature

Marsh, Kevin ; Lanitis, Tereza ; Neasham, David ; Orfanos, Panagiotis ; Caro, Jaime

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.