skip to main content
Idioma:

Independent Predictors of Revision Lumbar Fusion Outcomes and the Impact of Spine Surgeon Variability: Does It Matter Whether the Primary Surgeon Revises?

Montenegro, Thiago Scharth ; Singh, Akash ; Elia, Christopher ; Matias, Caio M ; Gonzalez, Glenn A ; Saiegh, Fadi Al ; Philipp, Lucas ; Hattar, Ellina ; Hines, Kevin ; Fatema, Umma ; Thalheimer, Sara ; Wu, Chengyuan ; Prasad, Srinivas K ; Jallo, Jack ; Heller, Joshua E ; Sharan, Ashwini ; Harrop, James

Neurosurgery, 2021-11, Vol.89 (5), p.836-843 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Oxford University Press

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Independent Predictors of Revision Lumbar Fusion Outcomes and the Impact of Spine Surgeon Variability: Does It Matter Whether the Primary Surgeon Revises?
  • Autor: Montenegro, Thiago Scharth ; Singh, Akash ; Elia, Christopher ; Matias, Caio M ; Gonzalez, Glenn A ; Saiegh, Fadi Al ; Philipp, Lucas ; Hattar, Ellina ; Hines, Kevin ; Fatema, Umma ; Thalheimer, Sara ; Wu, Chengyuan ; Prasad, Srinivas K ; Jallo, Jack ; Heller, Joshua E ; Sharan, Ashwini ; Harrop, James
  • Assuntos: Back surgery ; Humans ; Lumbar Vertebrae - surgery ; Neurosurgery ; Patients ; Retrospective Studies ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Fusion ; Statistical analysis ; Surgeons ; Surgical outcomes ; Surgical techniques ; Treatment Outcome ; Variables
  • É parte de: Neurosurgery, 2021-11, Vol.89 (5), p.836-843
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Abstract BACKGROUND There is a paucity of information regarding treatment strategies and variables affecting outcomes of revision lumbar fusions. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the influence of primary vs different surgeon on functional outcomes of revisions. METHODS All elective lumbar fusion revisions, March 2018 to August 2019, were retrospectively categorized as performed by the same or different surgeon who performed the primary surgery. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and clinical variables were collected. Multiple logistic regression identified multivariable-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of independent variables analyzed. RESULTS Of the 130 cases, 117 (90%) had complete data. There was a slight difference in age in the same (median: 59; interquartile range [IQR], 54-66) and different surgeon (median: 67; IQR, 56-72) groups (P = .02); all other demographic variables were not significantly different (P > .05). Revision surgery with a different surgeon had an ODI improvement (median: 8; IQR, 2-14) greater than revisions performed by the same surgeon (median: 1.5; IQR, −3 to 10) (P < .01). Revisions who achieved minimum clinically important difference (MCID) performed by different surgeon (59.7%) were also significantly greater than the ones performed by the same surgeon (40%) (P = .042). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that a different surgeon revising (OR, 2.37; [CI]: 1.007-5.575, P = .04) was an independent predictor of MCID achievement, each additional 2 years beyond the last surgery conferred a 2.38 ([CI]: 1.36-4.14, P < .01) times greater odds of MCID achievement, and the anterior lumbar interbody fusion approach decreased the chance of achieving MCID (OR, 0.19; [CI]: 0.04-0.861, P = .03). CONCLUSION All revision lumbar spinal fusion approaches may not achieve the same outcomes. This analysis suggests that revision surgeries may have better outcomes when performed by a different surgeon.
  • Editor: United States: Oxford University Press
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.