skip to main content
Idioma:

INEA editorial: Achieving 1.5 °C and climate justice

Dooley, Kate ; Gupta, Joyeeta ; Patwardhan, Anand

International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics, 2018-02, Vol.18 (1), p.1-9 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    INEA editorial: Achieving 1.5 °C and climate justice
  • Autor: Dooley, Kate ; Gupta, Joyeeta ; Patwardhan, Anand
  • Assuntos: Carbon sequestration ; Climate change ; Climate policy ; Cost benefit analysis ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Environment ; Environmental Economics ; Environmental justice ; Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice ; Environmental Management ; Environmental policy ; Equity ; Fairness ; Geoengineering ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouse gases ; Natural gas ; Nature Conservation ; Political Science ; Sustainable development
  • É parte de: International environmental agreements : politics, law and economics, 2018-02, Vol.18 (1), p.1-9
  • Descrição: The papers in this Special Issue grapple with the issue of how equity should be defined, elaborated and implemented not just with respect to the design and implementation of climate policy, but regarding what kind of science is promoted and how, and how country commitments can be viewed in terms of equity. Joyeeta Gupta and Karin Arts link the Right to Development with the Right to Promote Sustainable Development and analyze what the application of these rights implies for prospective oil and gas producers in the South. Bård Lahn argues that equity issues need to be debated actively (heating up), rather than being presented as resolved (cooling down). Jane Flegal and Aarti Gupta examine the trend toward using equity to justify solar geoengineering, while Turaj Faran and Lennart Olsson look at whether a simple cost-benefit analysis to justify carbon capture and storage adequately deals with the risks society takes with respect to such technologies. Kate Dooley and Sivan Kartha argue that the expectations from negative emission technologies in terms of using land to absorb greenhouse gas emissions ignore the risks of such approaches failing—potentially “locking in” higher global temperatures. Harald Winkler, Niklas Höhne, Guy Cunliffe, Takeshi Kuramochi, Amanda April and Maria Jose de Villafranca Casas examine the equity justification used by countries when they submitted their Intended Nationally Determined Contributions prior to Paris. Christian Holz, Sivan Kartha and Tom Athanasiou examine how efforts to meet the 1.5 °C target can be fairly shared. Sander Chan, Paula Ellinger and Oscar Widerberg look at how regional and national forms of orchestration can better catalyze local responses to climate change. These papers are briefly discussed below.
  • Editor: Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  2 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.