Idioma:

Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England

Devlin, Nancy J. ; Shah, Koonal K. ; Feng, Yan ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Hout, Ben

Health economics, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.7-22 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Wiley Periodicals Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England
Autor: Devlin, Nancy J. ; Shah, Koonal K. ; Feng, Yan ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Hout, Ben
Assuntos: Adult ; Aged ; Anxiety ; Decision Making ; Discomfort ; Discrete choice ; England ; EQ‐5D‐5L ; Female ; Health Status ; Humans ; Interviews as Topic ; Male ; Mental depression ; Middle Aged ; NICE ; Pain ; PROMs ; Quality of Life ; Quality-Adjusted Life Years ; Reproducibility of Results ; Research Design ; stated preferences ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Tradeoff analysis ; Valuation
É parte de: Health economics, 2018-01, Vol.27 (1), p.7-22
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Descrição: A new version of the EQ‐5D, the EQ‐5D‐5L, is available. The aim of this study is to produce a value set to support use of EQ‐5D‐5L data in decision‐making. The study design followed an international research protocol. Randomly selected members of the English general public completed 10 time trade‐off and 7 discrete choice experiment tasks in face‐to‐face interviews. A 20‐parameter hybrid model was used to combine time trade‐off and discrete choice experiment data to generate values for the 3,125 EQ‐5D‐5L health states. Valuation data are available for 996 respondents. Face validity of the data has been demonstrated, with more severe health states generally given lower values. Problems with pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression received the greatest weight. Compared to the existing EQ‐5D‐3L value set, there are considerably fewer “worse than dead” states (5.1%, compared with over one third), and the minimum value is higher. Values range from −0.285 (extreme problems on all dimensions) to 0.950 (for health states 11211 and 21111). Results have important implications for users of the EQ‐5D‐5L both in England and internationally. Quality‐adjusted life year gains from interventions seeking to improve very poor health may be smaller using this value set and may previously have been overestimated.
Editor: England: Wiley Periodicals Inc
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Valuing health‐related quality of life: An EQ‐5D‐5L value set for England

Devlin, Nancy J. ; Shah, Koonal K. ; Feng, Yan ; Mulhern, Brendan ; Hout, Ben

England: Wiley Periodicals Inc

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.