skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
Tipo de recurso
criteria input
qualquer lugar do registro
no título
como autor
no assunto
Data de publicação
lsr01
lsr02
lsr03
lsr04
Orientador
Show Results with:
no título
Show Results with:
qualquer lugar do registro
no título
como autor
no assunto
Data de publicação
lsr01
lsr02
lsr03
lsr04
Orientador
Mostra resultados com:
criteria input
que contêm minhas palavras de busca
com a frase exata
começa com
Mostra resultados com:
Índice
criteria input
E
OU
NÃO
This feature requires javascript
Respect, Individualism, and Colorblindness
EIDELSON, BENJAMIN
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020-04, Vol.129 (6), p.1600-1675
New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Respect, Individualism, and Colorblindness
Autor:
EIDELSON, BENJAMIN
Assuntos:
Analysis
;
Answers
;
Autonomy
;
Color blindness
;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
;
Equal protection
;
Equality
;
Equality before the law
;
Individualism
;
Individuality
;
JURISPRUDENCE
;
LEGAL THEORY
;
PHILOSOPHY
;
Post-racialism
;
Race
;
Race discrimination
;
RACIAL DISCRIMINATION
;
Racism
;
Regret
;
Remedies
;
Respect
;
Social aspects
;
Social meaning
;
SUPREME COURT
;
Supreme courts
;
United States. Supreme Court
É parte de:
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2020-04, Vol.129 (6), p.1600-1675
Notas:
YALE LAW JOURNAL, Vol. 129, No. 6, Apr 2020: 1600-1675
2020-05-26T04:17:16+10:00
AGIS_c.jpg
YALE LAW JOURNAL, Vol. 129, No. 6, Apr 2020, 1600-1675
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
Descrição:
What principle underlies the Supreme Court's "colorblind" or "anticlassification" approach to race and equal protection? According to the Court and many commentators, the answer lies in a kind of individualism–a conviction that people should be treated as individuals, not as instances of racial types. Yet the Court has said almost nothing about what it means to treat someone "as an individual." By excavating the philosophical foundations of that idea, this Article offers a framework for understanding, and then evaluating, the claim that the government fails to treat people as individuals when it classifies them by race. Rightly understood, the Article argues, treating people as individuals means showing respect for their individuality, a central facet of their moral standing as persons. To evaluate the claimed link between individualism and colorblindness, then, one first has to consider what respect for a person's individuality involves. Drawing on the philosophical literatures on respect and autonomy, the Article offers an answer to that question: treating someone as an individual requires taking due account of the information conveyed by her self-defining choices. But that answer entails that respect for a person's individuality does not inherently require, or even favor, disregard of information carried by her race. The Article thus offers an internal critique of the Supreme Court's avowedly "individualistic" approach to race and equal protection; it shows that the central moral argument for colorblindness rests on too shallow an account of what individualism itself demands. Building on that conclusion, the Article then turns to suggestions that racial distinctions–whatever their intrinsic moral status–are nonetheless stamped with social meanings that render them disrespectful of a person's individuality. Even if such meanings might justify limiting integrative race-based state action, the Article contends, the recognition that no more basic moral wrong is at work should transform the colorblindness project. It should prompt the Court to enforce colorblindness, if it does, with regret rather than indignation. And it should lead the Court to decide cases, and write opinions, in ways that avoid further entrenching social meanings that stand in the way of racial repair.
Editor:
New Haven: The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc
Idioma:
Inglês
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript