Idioma:

The need for appropriate language in the debate on medicalisation of pregnancy

Cluver, Catherine ; de Groot, Christianne ; Mol, Ben W ; Murphy, Kellie E ; Norman, Jane E ; Pacagnella, Rodolfo ; Palmer, Kirsten ; Poon, Liona C ; Rolnik, Daniel L ; Spong, Catherine Y ; Stock, Sarah J ; Thangaratinam, Shakila ; Tong, Stephen ; Verhoeven, Corine ; Vuong, Lan N ; Walker, Sue P ; Xiaohua, Liu

The Lancet (British edition), 2023-03, Vol.401 (10379), p.818-819 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Elsevier Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
The need for appropriate language in the debate on medicalisation of pregnancy
Autor: Cluver, Catherine ; de Groot, Christianne ; Mol, Ben W ; Murphy, Kellie E ; Norman, Jane E ; Pacagnella, Rodolfo ; Palmer, Kirsten ; Poon, Liona C ; Rolnik, Daniel L ; Spong, Catherine Y ; Stock, Sarah J ; Thangaratinam, Shakila ; Tong, Stephen ; Verhoeven, Corine ; Vuong, Lan N ; Walker, Sue P ; Xiaohua, Liu
Assuntos: Aggression ; Babies ; Decision making ; Female ; Health care ; Humans ; Induced labor ; Intervention ; Maternal & child health ; Medical research ; Medicalization ; Obstetrics ; Pregnancy ; Technology assessment ; Womens health
É parte de: The Lancet (British edition), 2023-03, Vol.401 (10379), p.818-819
Notas: SourceType-Other Sources-1
content type line 63
ObjectType-Correspondence-1
ObjectType-Commentary-2
Descrição: [...]in a recent UK law case, the judge upheld the right for women to have information about any material risk to make autonomous decisions about how to give birth.7 The debate about the medicalisation of pregnancy (and medicalisation of life in general) is important, but that debate should never be conflated with good research or used to impugn researchers and clinicians who address important questions in an appropriate and ethical manner. [...]GROG and other research networks have identified many interventions that are ineffective; these studies have protected women from the possible harm of such interventions.8,9 Additionally, the use of terms such as “obstetric violence” from The Lancet's Editor-in-Chief is unfortunate. SJS declares grants from the National Institute of Healthcare Research Health Technology and Assessment, Wellcome Trust, Medical Research Council, The Chief Scientist Office of Scotland, and Tommy's Charity, all paid to her institution; consulting fees on pre-term birth treatments to Natera; honoraria for educational speaking from Hologic, all paid to her institution; participation in the National Institute of Healthcare Research Health Technology and Assessment data monitoring committee and trial steering committee in the past 36 months; and a leadership role in the Trustee of Sands charity.
Editor: England: Elsevier Ltd
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

The need for appropriate language in the debate on medicalisation of pregnancy

England: Elsevier Ltd

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.