Idioma:

Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins

Moda, Mariana D. ; Godas, André Gustavo de L. ; Fernandes, Juliana C. ; Suzuki, Thaís Y. U. ; Guedes, Ana Paula A. ; Briso, André L. F. ; Bedran‐Russo, Ana Karina ; dos Santos, Paulo H.

Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2018-02, Vol.9 (1), p.n/a [Periódico revisado por pares]

Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins
Autor: Moda, Mariana D. ; Godas, André Gustavo de L. ; Fernandes, Juliana C. ; Suzuki, Thaís Y. U. ; Guedes, Ana Paula A. ; Briso, André L. F. ; Bedran‐Russo, Ana Karina ; dos Santos, Paulo H.
Assuntos: Acrylic Resins - chemistry ; Composite materials ; composite resin ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Dental enamel ; Dental Materials ; Dental Polishing - methods ; Dental Restoration, Permanent ; Dental restorative materials ; Materials Testing ; Microscopy, Electron, Scanning ; Nanocomposites - chemistry ; Particle Size ; polishing method ; Polymethacrylic Acids - chemistry ; Polyurethanes - chemistry ; Resins ; Statistical analysis ; Surface Properties ; Surface roughness ; surface smoothness ; thermocycling
É parte de: Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry, 2018-02, Vol.9 (1), p.n/a
Descrição: Aim The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of resin‐based composites subjected to a thermocycling procedure. Methods A total of 192 specimens were divided into 24 groups, according to composite materials (Filtek Z250, Point 4, Renamel Nanofill, Filtek Supreme Plus, Renamel Microfill, and Premise) and finishing and polishing systems (Sof‐Lex Pop On, Super Snap, Flexidisc, and Flexidisc+Enamelize). The specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5000 cycles). Results Filtek Supreme Plus showed the lowest surface roughness values before thermocycling. After thermocycling, Filtek Supreme Plus continued to have the lowest surface roughness, with a statistically‐significant difference for the other materials. After thermocycling, there was no statistically‐significant difference among all the polishing techniques studied. Conclusions The thermocycling was concluded as being able to change composite resins' surface roughness, whereas different finishing and polishing methods did not result in surface roughness changes after thermocycling.
Editor: Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 3

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Comparison of different polishing methods on the surface roughness of microhybrid, microfill, and nanofill composite resins

Moda, Mariana D. ; Godas, André Gustavo de L. ; Fernandes, Juliana C. ; Suzuki, Thaís Y. U. ; Guedes, Ana Paula A. ; Briso, André L. F. ; Bedran‐Russo, Ana Karina ; dos Santos, Paulo H.

Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.