Idioma:

Fevered Decisions: Race, Ethics, and Clinical Vulnerability in the Malarial Treatment of Neurosyphilis, 1922-1953

Gambino, Matthew

The Hastings Center report, 2015-07, Vol.45 (4), p.39-50 [Revista revisada por pares]

United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponible

Citas Citado por

Acciones

Título:
Fevered Decisions: Race, Ethics, and Clinical Vulnerability in the Malarial Treatment of Neurosyphilis, 1922-1953
Autor: Gambino, Matthew
Materias: African Americans ; Anti-Bacterial Agents - history ; Bioethics ; Brain - microbiology ; Care and treatment ; Coercion ; Decision Making - ethics ; Development and progression ; Disease Progression ; District of Columbia ; Ethics ; Ethics, Medical - history ; Ethics, Research - history ; Experiments ; History, 20th Century ; Hospitals, Psychiatric - ethics ; Hospitals, Psychiatric - history ; Human Experimentation - ethics ; Human Experimentation - history ; Humans ; Hyperthermia, Induced - ethics ; Hyperthermia, Induced - history ; Informed Consent - ethics ; Informed Consent - history ; Malaria ; Malaria - etiology ; Malaria - history ; Malpractice - history ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Mental Disorders - history ; Mental Disorders - microbiology ; Morals ; Neurosyphilis ; Neurosyphilis - history ; Neurosyphilis - therapy ; Penicillins - history ; Prisoners - history ; Race ; Sexual Behavior - ethics ; Sexual Behavior - history ; Syphilis ; Treponema pallidum - isolation & purification ; United States
Es parte de: The Hastings Center report, 2015-07, Vol.45 (4), p.39-50
Notas: ArticleID:HAST451
istex:CC8D2C50859B87D8BAA5219AE9F0AF7094972315
ark:/67375/WNG-ZKDBLLN7-7
Matthew Gambino, “Fevered Decisions: Race, Ethics, and Clinical Vulnerability in the Malarial Treatment of Neurosyphilis, 1922–1953,”
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Descripción: Syphilis occupies a unique position in the history of U.S. medicine and medical ethics. Given its widespread prevalence and variable presentation, syphilis was a major professional concern among late nineteenth‐ and early twentieth‐century physicians. Syphilis was also at the center of perhaps the most famous example of medical racism in our history, the U.S. Public Health Service Syphilis Study at Tuskegee, in which officials followed the natural history of the disease in a cohort of black men for forty years without offering treatment, even once penicillin became available. In this essay, I call attention to a less well‐known aspect of syphilis and its history. I examine one of the disease's most dreaded manifestations, neurosyphilis (also known as general paresis or general paralysis of the insane), and its treatment via malarial inoculation from the 1920s into the 1950s. The goal of this treatment, dramatic even to observers at the time, was to produce spiking fevers that would kill the syphilitic spirochete and arrest the disease process. My focus will be on developments at St. Elizabeths Hospital, a large‐scale federal psychiatric facility in the District of Columbia that served the city's residents and members of the U.S. military. Physicians at St. Elizabeths were the first in the United States to experiment with malarial fever therapy, treating their initial cohort of patients in December of 1922. Malarial fever therapy raised a host of ethical questions, rendered all the more complex from today's vantage point by efforts to understand them within the context of the time. What sorts of risks, both from malaria and via indirect exposure, might be deemed acceptable in the treatment of a devastating and almost invariably fatal disease? How ought researchers and clinicians to have approached the question of consent, itself an evolving concept in the early decades of the twentieth century, when the disease they were targeting impaired a patient's ability to reason effectively? Finally, at a time when segregated and inferior care for black Americans was the norm and when the black community bore a disproportionate burden of disease, who would have had access to malarial fever therapy, and at what cost?
Editor: United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Idioma: Inglés

Enlaces

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Volver a la lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 3 Siguiente Ir a la siguiente página

Realización: Logos de Redes Sociales:

Fevered Decisions: Race, Ethics, and Clinical Vulnerability in the Malarial Treatment of Neurosyphilis, 1922-1953

Gambino, Matthew

United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Buscando en bases de datos remotas, por favor espere