skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
The Supreme Court's Role in Defining the Jurisdiction of Military Courts: A Study and Proposal
Baldrate, Brian C
2005
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
The Supreme Court's Role in Defining the Jurisdiction of Military Courts: A Study and Proposal
Autor:
Baldrate, Brian C
Assuntos:
CIVIL WAR(UNITED STATES)
;
CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION
;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
;
COURT CASES
;
CUBA
;
DECISION MAKING
;
FEDERAL COURTS
;
FEDERAL LAW
;
FIRST WORLD WAR
;
GENEVA CONVENTIONS
;
GUANTANAMO BAY(CUBA)
;
HISTORY
;
Humanities and History
;
INTERNATIONAL LAW
;
JUDICIAL REVIEW
;
Military Forces and Organizations
;
MILITARY JURISDICTION
;
MILITARY LAW
;
MILITARY TRIBUNALS
;
ORIGINALISM
;
REVOLUTIONARY WAR
;
SALIM HAMDAN
;
SECOND WORLD WAR
;
Sociology and Law
;
SUPREME COURT
;
SUPREME COURT REVIEW
;
TEXTUALISM
;
TRANSLATION THEORY
;
UCMJ(UNIFORM CODE OF MILITARY JUSTICE)
;
UNCERTAINTY
;
UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
;
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Notas:
DTIC AND NTIS
Descrição:
This article analyzes the Supreme Court's judicial review over military tribunals to identify the constitutional limits of military courts within America's system of government. The central thesis is that the Supreme Court's review over military courts has failed to coherently define the boundary between federal courts and military tribunals. Rather than creating a consistent precedent, the Court's decisions have led to arbitrary results and an increased uncertainty about whether the military commissions at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, are constitutional. This article seeks to remedy this problem by proposing a method of constitutional interpretation that creates a principled distinction between the cases that belong in federal court and those matters properly before military tribunals. First, it lays the groundwork by defining the four different types of military tribunals and examining the nature of Supreme Court review over military courts. Next, it examines the historic use of military courts and looks at each instance of Supreme Court review over these military tribunals. Finally, it critiques the Court's textualist interpretation of the Constitution and demonstrates how translation theory provides a more effective method of defining the boundaries of military courts. It concludes by explaining why the current trial of Salim Hamdan by military commission is unconstitutional under translation theory.
Data de criação/publicação:
2005
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in DTIC$$FView record in $$GDTIC
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript