skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Ausipile Pty Ltd v Bothar Boring and Tunnelling (Australia) Pty Ltd
Jason Schroeder
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL, 2022, Vol.37 (6), p.545-565
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Ausipile Pty Ltd v Bothar Boring and Tunnelling (Australia) Pty Ltd
Autor:
Jason Schroeder
Assuntos:
Construction contracts
;
Construction industry
;
Consumer protection
;
Contracts
;
Interpretation and construction
;
Jurisprudence
;
Law and legislation
;
Payment
;
Subcontracting
É parte de:
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL, 2022, Vol.37 (6), p.545-565
Notas:
BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION LAW JOURNAL, Vol. 37, No. 6, Aug 2022, 545-565
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
Descrição:
Construction contracts – remuneration – statutory regulation of entitlement to and recovery of progress payments – payment claims – where the appellant and respondent entered a subcontract agreement to design and construct a secant pile launch shaft – where the respondent hired a crawler crane from the appellant to complete works under the head contract – where the appellant applied for judgment pursuant to section 78(2)(a) of the 'Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017' (Qld) to recover amounts owing under a payment claim but the application was dismissed – whether the variation in relation to the hire of the crawler crane related to a contract other than the subcontract – whether the payment claim contained claims in relation to two contracts – whether the payment claim was void for the purpose of the 'Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017' (Qld). Consumer protection – misleading or deceptive conduct or false representations – character or attributes of conduct or representation – silence and non-disclosure – where the respondent sent the appellant a letter stating that it would withhold further payment claims “as discussed” – where the appellant did not respond to the letter – whether the appellant’s silence was misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive.
Formato:
545-565
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Anterior
Resultado
15
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript