skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review

Seghers, Petronella A L Nelleke ; Wiersma, Anke ; Festen, Suzanne ; Stegmann, Mariken E ; Soubeyran, Pierre ; Rostoft, Siri ; O'Hanlon, Shane ; Portielje, Johanneke E A ; Hamaker, Marije E

Cancers, 2022-02, Vol.14 (5), p.1147 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Switzerland: MDPI AG

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Patient Preferences for Treatment Outcomes in Oncology with a Focus on the Older Patient-A Systematic Review
  • Autor: Seghers, Petronella A L Nelleke ; Wiersma, Anke ; Festen, Suzanne ; Stegmann, Mariken E ; Soubeyran, Pierre ; Rostoft, Siri ; O'Hanlon, Shane ; Portielje, Johanneke E A ; Hamaker, Marije E
  • Assuntos: Cancer ; Cancer therapies ; Clinical outcomes ; Conjoint analysis ; Decision making ; geriatric oncology ; Life Sciences ; Medical diagnosis ; Oncology ; patient preferences ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Population studies ; Preferences ; Quality of life ; Side effects ; Survival ; Systematic Review ; trade-off
  • É parte de: Cancers, 2022-02, Vol.14 (5), p.1147
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-3
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Review-1
    PMCID: PMC8909757
  • Descrição: For physicians, it is important to know which treatment outcomes are prioritized overall by older patients with cancer, since this will help them to tailor the amount of information and treatment recommendations. Older patients might prioritize other outcomes than younger patients. Our objective is to summarize which outcomes matter most to older patients with cancer. A systematic review was conducted, in which we searched Embase and Medline on 22 December 2020. Studies were eligible if they reported some form of prioritization of outcome categories relative to each other in patients with all types of cancer and if they included at least three outcome categories. Subsequently, for each study, the highest or second-highest outcome category was identified and presented in relation to the number of studies that included that outcome category. An adapted Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the risk of bias. In total, 4374 patients were asked for their priorities in 28 studies that were included. Only six of these studies had a population with a median age above 70. Of all the studies, 79% identified quality of life as the highest or second-highest priority, followed by overall survival (67%), progression- and disease-free survival (56%), absence of severe or persistent treatment side effects (54%), and treatment response (50%). Absence of transient short-term side effects was prioritized in 16%. The studies were heterogeneous considering age, cancer type, and treatment settings. Overall, quality of life, overall survival, progression- and disease-free survival, and severe and persistent side effects of treatment are the outcomes that receive the highest priority on a group level when patients with cancer need to make trade-offs in oncologic treatment decisions.
  • Editor: Switzerland: MDPI AG
  • Idioma: Inglês;Norueguês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  8 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.