skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War

Chari, Sharad ; Verdery, Katherine

Comparative studies in society and history, 2009-01, Vol.51 (1), p.6-34 [Periódico revisado por pares]

New York, USA: Cambridge University Press

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Thinking between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography after the Cold War
  • Autor: Chari, Sharad ; Verdery, Katherine
  • Assuntos: 20th century ; Aftermath Thematics ; Anthropology ; Anti-imperialism ; Bolshevism ; Capitalism ; Cold War ; Cold wars ; Colonialism ; Crime ; Cross-national analysis ; Decolonization ; Developing countries ; Diseases ; Empires ; Ethnography ; Ethnology ; History ; Ideology ; Imperialism ; Imprisonment ; Marxian economics ; Nationalism ; Post Cold War Period ; Post-Cold War ; Post-communist societies ; Postcolonialism ; Postcommunist Societies ; Race ; Racism ; Self-determination ; Socialism ; Soviet satellites
  • É parte de: Comparative studies in society and history, 2009-01, Vol.51 (1), p.6-34
  • Notas: istex:73E012511F39B555F9B26E26BD32A37D6E865397
    ArticleID:00002
    This paper began as a brief article by Verdery (2002), later used as the basis for a seminar on postsocialist and postcolonial studies, in the form of a dialogue between her and Ann Stoler, moderated by Chari. The event was organized by graduate students in the Doctoral Program in Anthropology and History at the University of Michigan. We thank Ann and the other participants for their comments. For the present version, Chari more than doubled the original text and added a number of points not part of the original discussion. Finally, we thank three anonymous CSSH reviewers for their stimulating suggestions.
    PII:S0010417509000024
    ark:/67375/6GQ-HS8XL3Z8-N
    ObjectType-Article-2
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-1
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Article-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
  • Descrição: Lenin spoke at the Second Congress of 1920 to multiple audiences. In continuity with the First International, he spoke in the utopian language of Bolshevism, of the successful revolutionary proletariat that had taken the state and was making its place in history without the intercession of bourgeois class rule. Recognizing the limits of socialism in one country surrounded by the military and economic might of “World imperialism,” however, Lenin also pressed for a broader, ongoing world-historic anti-imperialism in alliance with the oppressed of the East, who, it seemed, were neither sufficiently proletarianized, nor, as yet, subjects of history. There are many ways to situate this particular moment in Lenin's thought. One can see the budding conceits of Marxist social history, or “history from below,” in which millions in the East could become historical subjects under the sign of “anti-imperialism.” One can also see this gesture to those outside the pale as a flourish of the emergent Soviet empire, and as a projection of anxieties about Bolshevik control over a vast and varied Russian countryside with its own internal enemies. But Lenin also spoke to audiences who would make up the next, Third International, like the Indian Marxist M. N. Roy, who saw imperialism dividing the world into oppressed and oppressor nations. For this Third Worldist audience, looking increasingly to the new Soviet Union for material and military support for “national self-determination,” Lenin extends the historic mission of a future world socialism.
  • Editor: New York, USA: Cambridge University Press
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.