Idioma:

" HISTORY BELONGS TO THE WINNERS": THE BAZELON-LEVENTHAL DEBATE AND THE CONTINUING RELEVANCE OF THE PROCESS/SUBSTANCE DICHOTOMY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION

Krotoszynski, Ronald J.

Administrative law review, 2006-10, Vol.58 (4), p.995-1015 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
" HISTORY BELONGS TO THE WINNERS": THE BAZELON-LEVENTHAL DEBATE AND THE CONTINUING RELEVANCE OF THE PROCESS/SUBSTANCE DICHOTOMY IN JUDICIAL REVIEW OF AGENCY ACTION
Autor: Krotoszynski, Ronald J.
Assuntos: Administrative agencies ; Administrative courts ; Administrative law ; ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DISCUSSION FORUM ; Administrative law judges ; Decision making ; Environmental agencies ; Federal court decisions ; Government agencies ; Judges ; Judicial review ; Judicial reviews ; Legal proceedings ; Moral agency ; Theory
É parte de: Administrative law review, 2006-10, Vol.58 (4), p.995-1015
Descrição: Krotoszynski argues that the basic objection that federal Judge David Bazelon raised to the concept of hard look review in Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp v. Natural Resources Defense Council retains continuing validity. He asserts that a greater overt emphasis on process values might improve the quality of administrative decision making.
Editor: Chicago: Washington College of Law of American University and by the Section of Administrative Law and Regulatory Practice of the American Bar Association
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 4 Avançar Ir para próxima página