skip to main content
Idioma:
Primo Search
Clear Search Box
Search in: Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices

A critical response to “A critical review of sub-adult age estimation in biological anthropology” by Corron, Marchal, Condemi and Adalian (2018)

Cardoso, Hugo F.V.

Forensic science international, 2019-11, Vol.304, p.109881-109881, Article 109881 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Ireland: Elsevier B.V

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    A critical response to “A critical review of sub-adult age estimation in biological anthropology” by Corron, Marchal, Condemi and Adalian (2018)
  • Autor: Cardoso, Hugo F.V.
  • Assuntos: Age ; Age determination ; Anthropology ; Biomedical materials ; Chronology ; Data collection ; Experts ; Females ; Males ; Methods ; Parameters
  • É parte de: Forensic science international, 2019-11, Vol.304, p.109881-109881, Article 109881
  • Notas: SourceType-Other Sources-1
    content type line 63
    ObjectType-Correspondence-1
    ObjectType-Commentary-2
  • Descrição: Perhaps, most surprisingly, one of the 7 selected methods [10] is a conference presentation, thus not meeting the authors own requirement of being published in a peer-reviewed journal as an original research article – or found in reference books on skeletal and dental development or sub-adult osteology. Perhaps one of the greatest concerns with Corron and co-workers’ [1] criteria for choosing juvenile age estimation methods is the choice to classify as valid only those studies that included a sample size of 200 or more (the sample size recommended parameter). [17] do not provide data about sample size for age or sex in their study (one of the recommended parameters), and instead show a cumulative distribution plot for males and females that seem to differ by as much as 10%. Ultimately, it is surprising to see that 3 methods in the list of 7 are authored by Corron and co-workers and by some of Corron's co-authors. Since this list of 7 includes two studies that are not age estimation methods [14,19], this reduces the list to 5 valid or “best” methods.
  • Editor: Ireland: Elsevier B.V
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.