skip to main content

Bismuth as a general internal standard for lead in atomic absorption spectrometry

Bechlin, Marcos A. ; Fortunato, Felipe M. ; Ferreira, Edilene C. ; Neto, José A. Gomes ; Nóbrega, Joaquim A. ; Donati, George L. ; Jones, Bradley T.

Analytica chimica acta, 2014-06, Vol.831, p.24-30 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Netherlands: Elsevier B.V

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Bismuth as a general internal standard for lead in atomic absorption spectrometry
  • Autor: Bechlin, Marcos A. ; Fortunato, Felipe M. ; Ferreira, Edilene C. ; Neto, José A. Gomes ; Nóbrega, Joaquim A. ; Donati, George L. ; Jones, Bradley T.
  • Assuntos: Atomic absorption analysis ; Atomic absorption spectrometry ; Bismuth ; Calibration ; Graphite ; Lead ; Lead (metal) ; Plotting ; Standard deviation ; Universal internal standard
  • É parte de: Analytica chimica acta, 2014-06, Vol.831, p.24-30
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: [Display omitted] •Single internal standard is commonly proposed for definite application in AAS.•Internal standard for general use in AAS techniques is original.•Bi showed efficiency as internal standard for Pb determinations by FAAS and GFAAS.•Assorted samples were analyzed and accurate results were found. Bismuth was evaluated as internal standard for Pb determination by line source flame atomic absorption spectrometry (LS FAAS), high-resolution continuum source flame atomic absorption spectrometry (HR-CS FAAS) and line source graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (LS GFAAS). Analysis of samples containing different matrices indicated close relationship between Pb and Bi absorbances. Correlation coefficients of calibration curves built up by plotting APb/ABiversus Pb concentration were higher than 0.9953 (FAAS) and higher than 0.9993 (GFAAS). Recoveries of Pb improved from 52–118% (without IS) to 97–109% (IS, LS FAAS); 74–231% (without IS) to 96–109% (IS, HR-CS FAAS); and 36–125% (without IS) to 96–110% (IS, LS GFAAS). The relative standard deviations (n=12) were reduced from 0.6–9.2% (without IS) to 0.3–4.3% (IS, LS FAAS); 0.7–7.7% (without IS) to 0.1–4.0% (IS, HR-CS FAAS); and 2.1–13% (without IS) to 0.4–5.9% (IS, LS GFAAS).
  • Editor: Netherlands: Elsevier B.V
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.