skip to main content
Idioma:

Negotiation, Meet New Governance: Interests, Skills, and Selves

Cohen, Amy J.

Law & Social Inquiry, 2008-06, Vol.33 (2), p.501-562 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Negotiation, Meet New Governance: Interests, Skills, and Selves
  • Autor: Cohen, Amy J.
  • Assuntos: Comparative literature ; Governance ; Honeyman, Christopher ; Literary criticism ; Negotiation ; Negotiations ; Nonfiction ; Review Essay ; Schneider, Andrea Kupfer ; Skills ; Theory
  • É parte de: Law & Social Inquiry, 2008-06, Vol.33 (2), p.501-562
  • Notas: ArticleID:LSI111
    istex:A97090DE7635DFB60A5679BD62AC8C10F0011C8E
    ark:/67375/WNG-VFK2XQ3H-L
    Amy J. Cohen
    For comments, conversation, and generous reading, I wish to thank David Barron, Bob Bordone, James Brudney, Cindy Burack, Tommy Crocker, Ellen Deason, Christopher Honeyman, Garry Jenkins, Genevieve Lakier, Ed Lee, Debby Merritt, Michael Moffitt, Peter Shane, Barry Shank, William Simon, Marc Spindelman, Susan Sturm, Annecoos Wiersema, and especially Janet Halley and Ilana Gershon. I would also like to thank Susan Landrum for research assistance, Dean Nancy Rogers for her support through the Moritz College of Law Summer Research Fund, The Ohio State University Office of International Affairs for a faculty travel grant to Thailand, and Sabrina Gyorvary and the Earthrights Mekong School community for generously engaging me in their work.
    is an assistant professor of law at The Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. She can be reached at
    cohen.308@osu.edu
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: In this article, I critically examine two bodies of scholarship: negotiation literature and new governance literature. To that end, I consider The "Negotiator's Fieldbook" (2006), an ambitious survey of negotiation theory and practice edited by Andrea Kupfer Schneider and Christopher Honeyman, and key works by U.S. new governance architects, Michael Dorf, Charles Sabel, and William Simon. This comparison may surprise readers since negotiation literature largely focuses on interpersonal dynamics, and new governance literature aims at institutional change. I argue that these two literatures share similar assumptions about subjectivity that drive their sense of political hopefulness. In short, both envision a flexible problem-solving subject--shaped in negotiation by a discourse of skills and in new governance by a discourse of institutional design. Based on this descriptive claim, I illustrate how reading these literatures together suggests alternative perspectives from which to consider questions of power, inequality, and distribution relevant to both fields.
  • Editor: Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.