Idioma:

Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review

Byrne, Amy-Louise ; Baldwin, Adele ; Harvey, Clare Vaingankar, Janhavi Ajit

PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229923-e0229923 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Public Library of Science

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review
Autor: Byrne, Amy-Louise ; Baldwin, Adele ; Harvey, Clare
Vaingankar, Janhavi Ajit
Assuntos: Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Consumers ; General practitioners ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health care policy ; History, 20th Century ; History, 21st Century ; Humans ; Illnesses ; Literature reviews ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Midwifery ; Misalignment ; Nature ; Nurse-Patient Relations ; Nurses ; Nurses - organization & administration ; Nurses - psychology ; Nurses - standards ; Nursing ; Nursing care ; Nursing schools ; Nursing Services - history ; Nursing Services - organization & administration ; Nursing Services - standards ; Patient-centered care ; Patient-Centered Care - history ; Patient-Centered Care - organization & administration ; Patient-Centered Care - standards ; Patients ; People and Places ; Power (Philosophy) ; Quality ; Social Sciences
É parte de: PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0229923-e0229923
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Descrição: The aims of this literature review were to better understand the current literature about person-centred care (PCC) and identify a clear definition of the term PCC relevant to nursing practice. An integrative literature review was undertaken using The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Medline, Scopus and Pubmed databases. The limitations were English language, full text articles published between 1998 and 2018 within Australian, New Zealand, Canada, USA, Europe, Ireland and UK were included. The international context off PCC is then specifically related to the Australian context. The review adopted a thematic analysis to categorise and summarise themes with reference to the concept of PCC. The review process also adhered to the Preferred Reporting System for Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and applied the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools to ensure the quality of the papers included for deeper analysis. While definitions of PCC do exist, there is no universally used definition within the nursing profession. This review has found three core themes which contribute to how PCC is understood and practiced, these are People, Practice and Power. This review uncovered a malalignment between the concept of PCC and the operationalisation of the term; this misalignment was discovered at both the practice level, and at the micro, meso and micro levels of the healthcare service. The concept of PCC is well known to nurses, yet ill-defined and operationalised into practice. PCC is potentially hindered by its apparent rhetorical nature, and further investigation of how PCC is valued and operationalised through its measurement and reported outcomes is needed. Investigation of the literature found many definitions of PCC, but no one universally accepted and used definition. Subsequently, PCC remains conceptional in nature, leading to disparity between how it is interpreted and operationalised within the healthcare system and within nursing services.
Editor: United States: Public Library of Science
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Whose centre is it anyway? Defining person-centred care in nursing: An integrative review

Byrne, Amy-Louise ; Baldwin, Adele ; Harvey, Clare Vaingankar, Janhavi Ajit

United States: Public Library of Science

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.