skip to main content
Guest
e-Shelf
My Account
Sign out
Sign in
This feature requires javascript
Tags
e-Journals
e-Books
Databases
USP Libraries
Help
Help
Language:
English
Spanish
Portuguese (Brazil)
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
General Search
General Search
Physical Collection
Physical Collections
USP Intelectual Production
USP Production
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
General Search
Or select another collection:
Search in:
General Search
Advanced Search
Browse Search
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Film, observation and the mind
Evans, Bonnie ; Harbord, Janet Evans, Bonnie ; Harbord, Janet
History of the human sciences, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.3-11
[Peer Reviewed Journal]
London, England: SAGE Publications
Full text available
Citations
Cited by
View Online
Details
Reviews & Tags
More
Times Cited
This feature requires javascript
Actions
Add to e-Shelf
Remove from e-Shelf
E-mail
Print
Permalink
Citation
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
Delicious
Export RIS
Export BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Title:
Film, observation and the mind
Author:
Evans, Bonnie
;
Harbord, Janet
Evans, Bonnie
;
Harbord, Janet
Subjects:
Audiences
;
Behavior
;
Infants
;
Mothers
;
Motion pictures
;
Psychiatry
;
Psychological theories
;
Psychologists
;
Psychology
;
Tactics
;
Technology
Is Part Of:
History of the human sciences, 2024-04, Vol.37 (2), p.3-11
Notes:
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Description:
This special issue considers the significance of film to the establishment and development of scientific approaches to the mind. Bonnie Evans explores how the origins of film technologies in 1895 in France encouraged a series of innovative collaborations, influencing both psychological theorisation, and new filming techniques. Jeremy Blatter explains how Harvard psychologist Hugo Münsterberg created early films specifically designed to engage audiences using psychological tactics. Scott Curtis’ article examines how Yale psychologist Arnold Gesell was able to extract scientific data from a film. Felix Rietmann’s article explores a collection of infant observation films from the 1930s and 1960s and how they developed unique narratives of mothers’ engagement with their children that did not necessarily match up with dominant scientific theories. Janet Harbord's article considers how a trilogy of films made at the Maudsley Hospital in the 1950s engaged with innovative film-making techniques that captured behaviour as discrete units. Seth Watter further examines how William S. Condon's use of the unique technology of the Bell and Howell 173BD projector in the 1960s created new understandings of human behaviour that could not have been predicted in advance, and which were highly influenced by the technology itself. Finally, Des O’Rawe explores how radical approaches in both anti-psychiatry, and documentary film-making in the 1960s created new opportunities for audiences to engage with different psychological states. All of these developments in film and psychology continue to influence understandings in both these fields to the present day.
Publisher:
London, England: SAGE Publications
Language:
English
Links
View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Back to results list
Result
1
Next
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Searching Remote Databases, Please Wait
Searching for
in
scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP_FISICO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Show me what you have so far
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript