Idioma:

Contested concepts, general terms and constitutional evolution

Michael Stokes

The Sydney law review, 2007-12, Vol.29 (4), p.683-712 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
Contested concepts, general terms and constitutional evolution
Autor: Michael Stokes
Assuntos: Australia: Law and legislation ; Constitutional law ; CONSTITUTIONS ; Dworkin, Ronald ; Ethics ; JUDICIAL REVIEW ; Knowledge (Theory) ; Legal rights ; Marbury v Madison ; Parliaments ; Values
É parte de: The Sydney law review, 2007-12, Vol.29 (4), p.683-712
Notas: Sydney Law Review, The, Vol. 29, No. 4, Dec 2007: 683-712
SLR.jpg
SYDNEY LAW REVIEW, Vol. 29, No. 4, December 2007: 683-712
2008-03-14T10:35:00+11:00
Descrição: Courts as interpreters of the Constitution, but with no power to amend it or to invalidate laws which were valid when enacted - theory of concept-conception distinction - whether this can alleviate weakness in constitutional evolution.

Voltar para lista de resultados