skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
Search in:
Selecione a lista para navegar
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Por título
Por assunto
Por autor
Browse vid input
Busca Simples
This feature requires javascript
Rock-Paper-Scissors play: Beyond the win-stay/lose-
change
strategy
Zhang, Hanshu ; Moisan, Frederic ; Gonzalez, Cleotilde
Games, 2021-09, Vol.12 (3), p.1-15
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Basel: MDPI
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Rock-Paper-Scissors play: Beyond the win-stay/lose-
change
strategy
Autor:
Zhang, Hanshu
;
Moisan, Frederic
;
Gonzalez, Cleotilde
Assuntos:
Algorithms
;
Business administration
;
Design
;
Economics and Finance
;
Equilibrium
;
Experiments
;
Game theory
;
Humanities and Social Sciences
;
Players
;
rock-paper-scissors
;
Strategic planning
;
Strategy
;
theory of mind
;
win-stay/lose-
change
É parte de:
Games, 2021-09, Vol.12 (3), p.1-15
Descrição:
This research studied the
strategies
that players use in sequential adversarial games. We took the Rock-Paper-Scissors (RPS) game as an example and ran players in two experiments. The first experiment involved two humans, who played the RPS together for 100 times. Importantly, our payoff design in the RPS allowed us to differentiate between participants who used a random strategy from those who used a Nash strategy. We found that participants did not play in agreement with the Nash strategy, but rather, their behavior was closer to random. Moreover, the analyses of the participants' sequential actions indicated heterogeneous cycle-based behaviors: some participants' actions were independent of their past outcomes, some followed a well-known win-stay/lose-
change
strategy, and others exhibited the win-
change
/lose-stay behavior. To understand the sequential patterns of outcome-dependent actions, we designed probabilistic computer algorithms involving specific
change
actions (i.e., to downgrade or upgrade according to the immediate past outcome): the Win-Downgrade/Lose-Stay (WDLS) or Win-Stay/Lose-Upgrade (WSLU) strategies. Experiment 2 used these strategies against a human player. Our findings show that participants followed a win-stay strategy against the WDLS algorithm and a lose-change strategy against the WSLU algorithm, while they had difficulty in using an upgrade/downgrade direction, suggesting humans' limited ability to detect and counter the actions of the algorithm. Taken together, our two experiments showed a large diversity of sequential strategies, where the win-stay/lose-change strategy did not describe the majority of human players' dynamic behaviors in this adversarial situation.
Editor:
Basel: MDPI
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in HAL
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Anterior
Resultado
3
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript