Idioma:

Regulatory Responses to ‘Fake News’ and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation

Helm, Rebecca K ; Nasu, Hitoshi

Human rights law review, 2021-06, Vol.21 (2), p.302-328

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
Regulatory Responses to ‘Fake News’ and Freedom of Expression: Normative and Empirical Evaluation
Autor: Helm, Rebecca K ; Nasu, Hitoshi
Assuntos: Compliance ; Fake news ; False information ; Freedom of expression ; Freedom of speech ; HUMAN RIGHTS ; International law ; International law and human rights ; NATIONAL SECURITY ; PUBLIC HEALTH ; Rule of law ; Sanctions ; SOCIAL MEDIA
É parte de: Human rights law review, 2021-06, Vol.21 (2), p.302-328
Notas: HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, Vol. 21, No. 2, Jun 2021: 302-328
2021-04-17T20:03:10+10:00
HUMAN RIGHTS LAW REVIEW, Vol. 21, No. 2, Jun 2021, 302-328
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
Descrição: Abstract National authorities have responded with different regulatory solutions in attempts to minimise the adverse impact of fake news and associated information disorder. This article reviews three different regulatory approaches that have emerged in recent years—information correction, content removal or blocking, and criminal sanctions—and critically evaluates their normative compliance with the applicable rules of international human rights law and their likely effectiveness based on an evidence-based psychological analysis. It identifies, albeit counter intuitively, criminal sanction as an effective regulatory response that can be justified when it is carefully tailored in a way that addresses legitimate interests to be protected.
Editor: Nottingham: Oxford University Press
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados