skip to main content

Analysis of internal and external energy flows associated with projected process improvements in biomass ethanol production

Stone, K. (General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY.) ; Lynd, L.R

Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 1995-09, Vol.51 (1), p.569-584 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Analysis of internal and external energy flows associated with projected process improvements in biomass ethanol production
  • Autor: Stone, K. (General Electric Company, Schenectady, NY.) ; Lynd, L.R
  • Assuntos: BIOMASA ; BIOMASSE ; BOMBA DE CALOR ; EFFICACITE ; EFICACIA ; ELECTRICIDAD ; ELECTRICITE ; ETANOL ; ETHANOL ; POMPE A CHALEUR ; PRODUCCION ; PRODUCTION
  • É parte de: Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 1995-09, Vol.51 (1), p.569-584
  • Notas: P06
    9603493
  • Descrição: Possible improvements in biomass ethanol production are described involving heat-pumped distillation, steam-cycle heat integration, elimination of seed fermenters, pretreatment heat integration, advanced pretreatment, thermophilic DMC, and increased carbohydrate yield to 90% of theoretical. Although speculative, a futuristic process incorporating these improvements may be useful for anticipating some features of a technologically mature biomass ethanol process, as well as for comparing ethanol production to more technologically mature energy-conversion processes. Relative to the current state-of-the-art National Renewable Energy Laboratory process design, the futuristic process has 101% higher electricity revenue, 31% higher ethanol revenue, and 35-39% higher overall revenue depending on the assumed ethanol value. The overall first-law thermodynamic efficiency is 43% for the current NREL design and 59% for the futuristic process. A general consideration of the costs associated with the process improvements examined indicates that: 1. Elimination of seed reactors, advanced pretreatment, and thermophilic DMC all have large potential cost reductions independent of their benefits with respect to increased surplus electricity; 2. Steam cycle improvements and pretreatment heat integration are expected to have modest cost benefits that are dependent on increased electricity revenues; and 3. The relative cost of heat-pumped distillation depends on scale, capital recovery, and electricity value, but is generally similar to the already low cost of conventional distillation provided that the fermentation broth has a reasonably high ethanol concentration. A comparison of utilizing biomass for ethanol-electricity coproduction and utilizing biomass for dedicated electricity production indicates that these two alternatives have approximately equal economic benefits. At the electricity yields associated with the futuristic process, every 1% displacement of US transportation demand
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.