skip to main content
Primo Advanced Search
Primo Advanced Search Query Term
Primo Advanced Search prefilters

Trends in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in the United States From 1993 to 2009

Greenspon, Arnold J., MD ; Patel, Jasmine D., PhD ; Lau, Edmund, MS ; Ochoa, Jorge A., PhD ; Frisch, Daniel R., MD ; Ho, Reginald T., MD ; Pavri, Behzad B., MD ; Kurtz, Steven M., PhD

Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-10, Vol.60 (16), p.1540-1545 [Periódico revisado por pares]

New York: Elsevier Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Trends in Permanent Pacemaker Implantation in the United States From 1993 to 2009
  • Autor: Greenspon, Arnold J., MD ; Patel, Jasmine D., PhD ; Lau, Edmund, MS ; Ochoa, Jorge A., PhD ; Frisch, Daniel R., MD ; Ho, Reginald T., MD ; Pavri, Behzad B., MD ; Kurtz, Steven M., PhD
  • Assuntos: Age ; Calendars ; Cardiology ; Cardiovascular ; Clinical trials ; Comorbidity ; Confidence intervals ; Demographics ; Health care policy ; healthcare policy ; Internal Medicine ; Medicaid ; Medicare ; Mortality ; permanent pacemaker ; Rural health care ; sick sinus syndrome ; Surgery ; Teaching hospitals ; Trends
  • É parte de: Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2012-10, Vol.60 (16), p.1540-1545
  • Descrição: Objectives This study sought to define contemporary trends in permanent pacemaker use by analyzing a large national database. Background The Medicare National Coverage Determination for permanent pacemaker, which emphasized single-chamber pacing, has not changed significantly since 1985. We sought to define contemporary trends in permanent pacemaker use by analyzing a large national database. Methods We queried the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to identify permanent pacemaker implants between 1993 and 2009 using the International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification procedure codes for dual-chamber (DDD), single-ventricular (VVI), single-atrial (AAI), or biventricular (BiV) devices. Annual permanent pacemaker implantation rates and patient demographics were analyzed. Results Between 1993 and 2009, 2.9 million patients received permanent pacemakers in the United States. Overall use increased by 55.6%. By 2009, DDD use increased from 62% to 82% (p < 0.001), whereas single-chamber ventricular pacemaker use fell from 36% to 14% (p = 0.01). Use of DDD devices was higher in urban, nonteaching hospitals (79%) compared with urban teaching hospitals (76%) and rural hospitals (72%). Patients with private insurance (83%) more commonly received DDD devices than Medicaid (79%) or Medicare (75%) recipients (p < 0.001). Patient age and Charlson comorbidity index increased over time. Hospital charges ($2011) increased 45.3%, driven by the increased cost of DDD devices. Conclusions There is a steady growth in the use of permanent pacemakers in the United States. Although DDD device use is increasing, whereas single-chamber ventricular pacemaker use is decreasing. Patients are becoming older and have more medical comorbidities. These trends have important health care policy implications.
  • Editor: New York: Elsevier Inc
  • Idioma: Inglês

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.