Idioma:

Editorial

Luisa Veras de Sandes-Guimarães ; Flavio Hourneaux Junior

RAUSP management journal, 2021-01, Vol.56 (1), p.2-8 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
Editorial
Autor: Luisa Veras de Sandes-Guimarães ; Flavio Hourneaux Junior
Assuntos: Case studies ; Causality ; Editorials ; Knowledge ; Researchers
É parte de: RAUSP management journal, 2021-01, Vol.56 (1), p.2-8
Descrição: [...]it has been recognised that the path between scientific research and its impact is a complex and non-linear process, including several interactions among researchers, users and stakeholders and interconnections among research activities and their outcomes (Penfield, Baker, Scoble, & Wykes, 2014; Riley et al., 2018). Other examples cited in the literature (from DNA discovery to DNA fingerprinting – 30 years; treatments for cardiovascular diseases – 10–25 years) (Penfield et al., 2014) mark the difficulty in deciding for a timeframe for impact evaluation. In the UK context, the Research Excellence Framework (REF) (REF, 2019) values impact case studies being more than published papers (one 4-star case study = six 4-star scientific papers). Morton (2015) presents some solutions to address this problem based on examples from literature: early documentary research and, after a lag period, a workshop-based follow-up; immediate analysis to characterise local and short-term and impacts and analysis after a time lag to evaluate long-term and broader impacts.
Editor: São Paulo: Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados

Anterior Resultado 4 Avançar Ir para próxima página