skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Dialoguing through ‘deficiting’? Transforming science communication in radiological protection research
Van Oudheusden, Michiel
2021
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Dialoguing through ‘deficiting’? Transforming science communication in radiological protection research
Autor:
Van Oudheusden, Michiel
Assuntos:
Deficit
;
Dialogue
;
Radiological Protection
;
Science Communication
;
Social
Sciences
Descrição:
European nuclear policy and research programs increasingly emphasize the importance of initiating dialogue with citizens and ‘public participation’ in nuclear research and development (R&D). In this presentation, I consider how these formally-sanctioned appeals to participatory science communication are received and enacted in nuclear R&D spaces. Based on my interdisciplinary work as a social scientist in radiological protection, I illustrate how colleagues (nuclear scientists, engineers, safety personnel) increasingly show awareness of the challenges of publicly communicating science, while continuing to view the public as ignorant of science and in need of science education. Whereas this deficit view has been widely criticized by social scientists studying the public communication of science, I argue that it can facilitate the ‘opening up’ of R&D processes to wider publics and considerations when it is clearly differentiated from contending science communication models and practices. Social scientists can help to make differentiation of this kind instructive and potentially transformative for all stakeholders, not by insisting on symmetrical, two-way dialogue between them but by urging them to articulate and refine their views in confrontation with competing problem definitions, stakes, and evidence.
Data de criação/publicação:
2021
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in Cambridge University Library$$FView record in $$GCambridge University Library
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Resultado
1
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript