Idioma:

Discrimination in lexical decision

Milin, Petar ; Feldman, Laurie Beth ; Ramscar, Michael ; Hendrix, Peter ; Baayen, R Harald van Rijn, Hedderik

PloS one, 2017-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e0171935-e0171935 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Public Library of Science

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Discrimination in lexical decision
Autor: Milin, Petar ; Feldman, Laurie Beth ; Ramscar, Michael ; Hendrix, Peter ; Baayen, R Harald
van Rijn, Hedderik
Assuntos: Adolescent ; Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Cognition & reasoning ; Computational linguistics ; Cornea ; Decision analysis ; Decision Making ; Discrimination ; Discrimination learning ; Discrimination Learning - physiology ; Experimental psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Laboratories ; Language ; Language processing ; Lexical access ; Male ; Memory ; Mental task performance ; Morphology ; Natural language interfaces ; Natural language processing ; Orthography ; Pattern Recognition, Visual - physiology ; Perceptual Masking - physiology ; Physical Sciences ; Priming ; Principal components analysis ; Reaction Time ; Reading ; Segmentation ; Semantics ; Seminars ; Social Sciences ; Speech - physiology ; Vocabulary ; Young Adult
É parte de: PloS one, 2017-02, Vol.12 (2), p.e0171935-e0171935
Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceptualization: PM LBF MR RHB. Data curation: PM LBF RHB PH. Formal analysis: PM RHB PH. Funding acquisition: LBF RHB. Investigation: LBF RHB PM PH. Methodology: PM RHB MR PH. Project administration: PM RHB LBF. Resources: PM LBF MR PH RHB. Software: PM RHB PH. Supervision: PM LBF RHB MR. Validation: PM LBF RHB. Visualization: PM RHB PH. Writing – original draft: PM LBF MR PH RHB. Writing – review & editing: PM LBF MR PH RHB.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Descrição: In this study we present a novel set of discrimination-based indicators of language processing derived from Naive Discriminative Learning (ndl) theory. We compare the effectiveness of these new measures with classical lexical-distributional measures-in particular, frequency counts and form similarity measures-to predict lexical decision latencies when a complete morphological segmentation of masked primes is or is not possible. Data derive from a re-analysis of a large subset of decision latencies from the English Lexicon Project, as well as from the results of two new masked priming studies. Results demonstrate the superiority of discrimination-based predictors over lexical-distributional predictors alone, across both the simple and primed lexical decision tasks. Comparable priming after masked corner and cornea type primes, across two experiments, fails to support early obligatory segmentation into morphemes as predicted by the morpho-orthographic account of reading. Results fit well with ndl theory, which, in conformity with Word and Paradigm theory, rejects the morpheme as a relevant unit of analysis. Furthermore, results indicate that readers with greater spelling proficiency and larger vocabularies make better use of orthographic priors and handle lexical competition more efficiently.
Editor: United States: Public Library of Science
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Discrimination in lexical decision

Milin, Petar ; Feldman, Laurie Beth ; Ramscar, Michael ; Hendrix, Peter ; Baayen, R Harald van Rijn, Hedderik

United States: Public Library of Science

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.