skip to main content
Idioma:

A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments

Stahl, Bernd Carsten ; Antoniou, Josephina ; Bhalla, Nitika ; Brooks, Laurence ; Jansen, Philip ; Lindqvist, Blerta ; Kirichenko, Alexey ; Marchal, Samuel ; Rodrigues, Rowena ; Santiago, Nicole ; Warso, Zuzanna ; Wright, David

The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-11, Vol.56 (11), p.12799-12831 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments
  • Autor: Stahl, Bernd Carsten ; Antoniou, Josephina ; Bhalla, Nitika ; Brooks, Laurence ; Jansen, Philip ; Lindqvist, Blerta ; Kirichenko, Alexey ; Marchal, Samuel ; Rodrigues, Rowena ; Santiago, Nicole ; Warso, Zuzanna ; Wright, David
  • Assuntos: Artificial Intelligence ; Assessments ; Computer Science ; Deforestation ; Energy distribution ; Ethical standards ; Organizational aspects ; Qualitative analysis ; Systematic review
  • É parte de: The Artificial intelligence review, 2023-11, Vol.56 (11), p.12799-12831
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Artificial intelligence (AI) is producing highly beneficial impacts in many domains, from transport to healthcare, from energy distribution to marketing, but it also raises concerns about undesirable ethical and social consequences. AI impact assessments (AI-IAs) are a way of identifying positive and negative impacts early on to safeguard AI’s benefits and avoid its downsides. This article describes the first systematic review of these AI-IAs. Working with a population of 181 documents, the authors identified 38 actual AI-IAs and subjected them to a rigorous qualitative analysis with regard to their purpose, scope, organisational context, expected issues, timeframe, process and methods, transparency and challenges. The review demonstrates some convergence between AI-IAs. It also shows that the field is not yet at the point of full agreement on content, structure and implementation. The article suggests that AI-IAs are best understood as means to stimulate reflection and discussion concerning the social and ethical consequences of AI ecosystems. Based on the analysis of existing AI-IAs, the authors describe a baseline process of implementing AI-IAs that can be implemented by AI developers and vendors and that can be used as a critical yardstick by regulators and external observers to evaluate organisations’ approaches to AI.
  • Editor: Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.