Idioma:

Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial

Olavarria, Oscar A ; Bernardi, Karla ; Shah, Shinil K ; Wilson, Todd D ; Wei, Shuyan ; Pedroza, Claudia ; Avritscher, Elenir B ; Loor, Michele M ; Ko, Tien C ; Kao, Lillian S ; Liang, Mike K

BMJ (Online), 2020-07, Vol.370, p.m2457-m2457 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Enviar para

Título:
Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial
Autor: Olavarria, Oscar A ; Bernardi, Karla ; Shah, Shinil K ; Wilson, Todd D ; Wei, Shuyan ; Pedroza, Claudia ; Avritscher, Elenir B ; Loor, Michele M ; Ko, Tien C ; Kao, Lillian S ; Liang, Mike K
Assuntos: Abdomen ; Abdominal wall ; Clinical trials ; Defects ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency Service, Hospital ; Hernia ; Hernia, Ventral - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects ; Herniorrhaphy - economics ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Hospital Costs ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - economics ; Length of Stay ; Operative Time ; Pain ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications ; Quality of Life ; Recurrence ; Reoperation ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - adverse effects ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - economics ; Robotics ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Sutures ; Wounds
É parte de: BMJ (Online), 2020-07, Vol.370, p.m2457-m2457
Notas: ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-News-3
ObjectType-Feature-4
ObjectType-Undefined-1
content type line 23
Descrição: AbstractObjectiveTo determine whether robotic ventral hernia repair is associated with fewer days in the hospital 90 days after surgery compared with laparoscopic repair.DesignPragmatic, blinded randomized controlled trial.SettingMultidisciplinary hernia clinics in Houston, USA.Participants124 patients, deemed appropriate candidates for elective minimally invasive ventral hernia repair, consecutively presenting from April 2018 to February 2019.InterventionsRobotic ventral hernia repair (n=65) versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (n=59).Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was number of days in hospital within 90 days after surgery. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits, operating room time, wound complications, hernia recurrence, reoperation, abdominal wall quality of life, and costs from the healthcare system perspective. Outcomes were pre-specified before data collection began and analyzed as intention to treat.ResultsPatients from both groups were similar at baseline. Ninety day follow-up was completed in 123 (99%) patients. No evidence was seen of a difference in days in hospital between the two groups (median 0 v 0 days; relative rate 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 2.19; P=0.82). For secondary outcomes, no differences were noted in emergency department visits, wound complications, hernia recurrence, or reoperation. However, robotic repair had longer operative duration (141 v 77 min; mean difference 62.89, 45.75 to 80.01; P≤0.001) and increased healthcare costs ($15 865 (£12 746; €14 125) v $12 955; cost ratio 1.21, 1.07 to 1.38; adjusted absolute cost difference $2767, $910 to $4626; P=0.004). Among patients with robotic ventral hernia repair, two had an enterotomy compared none with laparoscopic repair. The median one month postoperative improvement in abdominal wall quality of life was 3 with robotic ventral hernia repair compared with 15 following laparoscopic repair.ConclusionThis study found no evidence of a difference in 90 day postoperative hospital days between robotic and laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. However, robotic repair increased operative duration and healthcare costs.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03490266.
Editor: England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD
Idioma: Inglês

Links

View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed

Voltar para lista de resultados

Realização: Logos de Redes Sociais:

Robotic versus laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: multicenter, blinded randomized controlled trial

Olavarria, Oscar A ; Bernardi, Karla ; Shah, Shinil K ; Wilson, Todd D ; Wei, Shuyan ; Pedroza, Claudia ; Avritscher, Elenir B ; Loor, Michele M ; Ko, Tien C ; Kao, Lillian S ; Liang, Mike K

England: BMJ Publishing Group LTD

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.