skip to main content
Idioma:

EVASION, PRIVATE EVENTS, AND PRAGMATISM: A REPLY TO MOORE'S RESPONSE TO MY REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF RADICAL BEHAVIORISM

Baum, William M.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011-01, Vol.95 (1), p.141-144 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    EVASION, PRIVATE EVENTS, AND PRAGMATISM: A REPLY TO MOORE'S RESPONSE TO MY REVIEW OF CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF RADICAL BEHAVIORISM
  • Autor: Baum, William M.
  • Assuntos: B. F. Skinner ; behavior analysis ; Behavior Patterns ; Behaviorism ; Book Review, Response, and Reply ; Criticism ; Earthquakes ; molar view ; Plate tectonics ; pragmatism ; private events ; radical behaviorism ; Studies ; Verbal Stimuli
  • É parte de: Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 2011-01, Vol.95 (1), p.141-144
  • Descrição: Moore's screed in response to my review of his book uses several rhetorical tricks to counter criticism without actually addressing it: he tries to preempt the transparency of his own orthodoxy by groundlessly accusing me of orthodoxy; he caricatures my criticisms to make them appear obviously wrong; he professes lack of understanding so as to dodge having to attempt a genuine response; and he engages in pejorative labeling to dismiss the criticisms without analysis. From a scientific and pragmatic point of view, private events are a mistake, precisely because they are private. They cannot serve as independent variables, as Moore suggests, because they cannot be measured; “private independent variable” is a contradiction in terms. When we carefully examine locutions like “observe” and “report on,” we discover that they entail only public verbal and nonverbal behavior, not objects and not private events as objects. A person in pain is not reporting on anything, is engaging in public verbal and nonverbal pain‐behavior, and an infant or a dog may be considered to be in pain. The public behavior is all that matters, because determining whether a person is really in pain privately is impossible. The same is true of any private event, and the control of the public behavior on which the verbal community comments lies in the public environment. We cannot have two sets of principles, one for verbal behavior and one for nonverbal behavior or one for humans and one for other animals.
  • Editor: Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglês
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.