Idioma:

Bolling, equal protection, due process, and Lochnerphobia

Bernstein, David E

The Georgetown law journal, 2005-04, Vol.93 (4), p.1253 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por

Título:
Bolling, equal protection, due process, and Lochnerphobia
Autor: Bernstein, David E
Assuntos: Due process of law ; Education policy ; Equal rights ; Equality before the law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Race discrimination ; Segregation law ; Supreme Court decisions
É parte de: The Georgetown law journal, 2005-04, Vol.93 (4), p.1253
Descrição: In Brown v. Board of Education, the US Supreme Court invalidated state and local schools segregation laws as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. That same day, in Bolling v. Sharpe, the Court held unconstitutional de jure segregation in Washington DC's public schools under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. Fifty years after it was decided, Bolling remains one of the Warren Court's most controversial decisions. Bernstein offers a scholarly criticism of Bolling.
Editor: Washington: Georgetown University Law Center
Idioma: Inglês

Voltar para lista de resultados