skip to main content

Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva

Alshali, Ruwaida Z ; Salim, Nesreen A ; Satterthwaite, Julian D ; Silikas, Nick

Journal of dentistry, 2015-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1511-1518 [Periódico revisado por pares]

England: Elsevier Ltd

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Long-term sorption and solubility of bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites in water and artificial saliva
  • Autor: Alshali, Ruwaida Z ; Salim, Nesreen A ; Satterthwaite, Julian D ; Silikas, Nick
  • Assuntos: Analysis of variance ; Artificial saliva ; Bulk-fill ; Composite materials ; Composite Resins - chemistry ; Curing ; Dental Materials - chemistry ; Dentistry ; Diamonds ; Discs ; Light ; Materials Testing ; Mechanical properties ; Methacrylates - chemistry ; Moisture absorption ; Polyesters ; Polymerization ; Polymers ; Potassium ; Resin-composite ; Resins ; Saliva ; Saliva, Artificial - chemistry ; Solubility ; Solvents ; Sorption ; Standard deviation ; Studies ; Water ; Water - chemistry
  • É parte de: Journal of dentistry, 2015-12, Vol.43 (12), p.1511-1518
  • Notas: ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Abstract Objectives To assess sorption and solubility of several bulk-fill and conventional resin-composites after one-year storage in water and artificial saliva (AS). Methods Six bulk-fill (SureFil SDR, Venus Bulk Fill, X-tra base, Filtek Bulk Fill flowable, Sonic Fill, and Tetric EvoCeram Bulk Fill) and eight conventional resin-composites (Grandioso Flow, Venus Diamond Flow, XFlow, Filtek Supreme XTE, Grandioso, Venus Diamond, TPH Spectrum, and Filtek Z250) were tested. Disc shaped samples ( n = 5) were randomly immersed into distilled water and AS for one-year period and weighed at different time intervals. Data were analysed using repeated measures ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc test ( α = 0.05). Results In water, all materials (with the exception of X-Flow) reached a stable mass within three months with a slow increase observed in AS up to one year. Sorption values in water and AS for most materials were not significantly different ( p ≥ 0.2). Sorption and solubility values in water ranged from (6.5 μg/mm3 and −1.77 μg/mm3 respectively) for X-tra base to (78.8 μg/mm3 and 44.77 μg/mm3 respectively) for X-Flow ( p < 0.005). Sorption of the polymer matrix in water ranged from 1.18% for XB to 9.95 % for XF. Conclusions Water sorption and solubility of resin-composites are material-dependent and highly affected by the filler loading and hydrophilicity of the resin matrix. BisEMA and UDMA-BisEMA based resins appeared to be more hydrophobic than BisGMA based systems. Water and AS, are generally comparable as storage media in terms of water sorption. Clinical significance Bulk-fill materials and conventional resin-composites tested varied in terms of sorption and solubility but both were considered stable in longterm water storage. The composition of each material is critical and can affect the long-term clinical performance of either type of resincomposites.
  • Editor: England: Elsevier Ltd
  • Idioma: Inglês;Persa

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.