skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication

Yang, L. Y. ; Manhas, D. S. ; Howard, A. F. ; Olson, R. A.

Supportive care in cancer, 2018, Vol.26 (1), p.41-60 [Periódico revisado por pares]

Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication
  • Autor: Yang, L. Y. ; Manhas, D. S. ; Howard, A. F. ; Olson, R. A.
  • Assuntos: Analysis ; Audio software ; Cancer patients ; Cancer research ; Clinical outcomes ; Communication ; Evidence-based medicine ; Humans ; Interpersonal communication ; Medical Oncology - methods ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Pain Medicine ; Patient outcomes ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Physician patient relationships ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Review Article ; Systematic review
  • É parte de: Supportive care in cancer, 2018, Vol.26 (1), p.41-60
  • Notas: SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-4
    ObjectType-Undefined-1
    content type line 23
    ObjectType-Review-2
    ObjectType-Article-3
  • Descrição: Purpose Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an increasingly popular tool to optimize care and bridge the gap between patient experience and clinician understanding. The aim of this review was to identify mechanisms through which PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication in the adult oncology population. Methods We conducted a systematic review of the published literature using the following data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cab Direct, and CDSR. Studies included in this review reported on the outcomes of PRO use, used PROs as an intervention and not as a study outcome measurement tool, included cancer patients or survivors as study participants, and analyzed patient-clinician communication. Results We identified 610 unique records, of which 43 publications met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Synthesis of the reviewed studies provided evidence of the usefulness of PROs in facilitating patient-clinician communication on a variety of topics. We identified mechanisms though which PROs influenced patient-clinician communication to include increasing symptom awareness, prompting discussion, streamlining consultations, and facilitating inter-professional communication. Barriers to PRO use in communication improvement include technical problems impeding its administration and completion, compliance issues due to lack of incentive or forgetfulness, and use of PROs that do not appropriately assess issues relevant to the patient. Facilitators include increased education on PRO use, using PRO tools that patients find more acceptable, and providing patient data summaries in an easily accessible format for clinicians. Conclusions Our review suggests that PROs facilitate patient-clinician communication through various mechanisms that could perhaps contribute to improvements in symptom management and survival. The impact of PROs on clinical outcomes, however, remains poorly studied.
  • Editor: Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.