skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
A New Approach to the Teague Doctrine
Turner, Kendall
Stanford law review, 2014-05, Vol.66 (5), p.1159-1194
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Stanford: students of the Stanford Law School
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
A New Approach to the Teague Doctrine
Autor:
Turner, Kendall
Assuntos:
CAPITAL PUNISHMENT
;
Claims
;
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW
;
Convictions
;
Court decisions and opinions
;
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
;
Criminals
;
Defendants
;
Evaluation
;
Federal court decisions
;
Federal courts
;
Federalism
;
Government regulation
;
Habeas corpus
;
Judicial reviews
;
Jurisprudence
;
Law and legislation
;
Laws, regulations and rules
;
Legal proceedings
;
Legal status, laws, etc
;
Petitioners
;
Petitions
;
PRISONERS
;
Retroaction
;
Retroactive judicial decisions
;
Retroactive laws
;
State court decisions
;
State courts
;
Trials
;
United States Supreme Court doctrines
É parte de:
Stanford law review, 2014-05, Vol.66 (5), p.1159-1194
Notas:
2019-08-19T15:42:01+10:00
Stanford Law Review, Vol. 66, No. 5, May 2014, 1159-1194
STANFORD LAW REVIEW, Vol. 66, No. 5, May 2014: 1159-1194
Informit, Melbourne (Vic)
Descrição:
Teague v. Lane generally precludes the retroactive application of new constitutional rules of criminal procedure to collateral review of criminal convictions. When federal courts reviewing state convictions apply this rule, it has a certain amount of logic: it protects society's interest in federalism and finality. But courts apply this rule to cases in myriad procedural postures, even when the forces motivating Teague are not present. This Note will examine three scenarios where Teague has been blindly invoked. It will then explain why this blind invocation is not only theoretically but also practically problematic, and it will suggest a solution (or a start of a solution) to the problem.
Editor:
Stanford: students of the Stanford Law School
Idioma:
Inglês
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Anterior
Resultado
8
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Anterior
Página Inicial
RSS
Feed
Políticas
Fale Conosco
Logos de Redes Sociais: 
Logos de Redes Sociais: