skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Sinified academic Marxism and Arif Dirlik's (self-)criticism of postcolonial studies
Chen, Po-hsi
Inter-Asia cultural studies, 2021-10, Vol.22 (4), p.533-542
[Periódico revisado por pares]
Abingdon: Routledge
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Sinified academic Marxism and Arif Dirlik's (self-)criticism of postcolonial studies
Autor:
Chen, Po-hsi
Assuntos:
19th century
;
Academic Chinese Marxism
;
Arif Dirlik
;
complicity
;
globalization
;
Historiography
;
Institutionalization
;
Marxism
;
postcolonial studies
;
Postcolonialism
;
revolution
;
Third World intellectuals
;
Universalism
É parte de:
Inter-Asia cultural studies, 2021-10, Vol.22 (4), p.533-542
Descrição:
"The Postcolonial Aura," first published in 1994, marks an abrupt shift of Dirlik's research focus from Chinese revolutionary historiography to a critique of postcolonial studies. As the two fields are far apart, so far, few have noticed the continuities between his earlier and later works. This essay attempts to reconnect several motifs that undergird Dirlik's oeuvre by reconnecting his Revolution and History (1978) and The Postcolonial Aura. I propose to focus on two specific points that recurred throughout Dirlik's lifelong concerns: first, the institutionalization of given disciplines; and second, universalism and particularities in the establishment of the disciplines in question. While Dirlik valorized late-1920s and early-1930s academic Marxism, he did not equally commend the institutionalization of postcolonial studies in post-1990s North America. He argued that the latter was the product of Third World intellectuals' entrance in the First World academia. The essay then discusses the relationship between postcolonialism and Marxism in Dirlik's works. Although postcolonial studies repudiates the universalistic pretensions embedded in nineteenth-century Marxism, I note that Chinese Marxist intellectuals in the 1920s and 1930s examined by Dirlik in fact championed the Marxian universalism. In sum, I suggest that a combined reading of Dirlik's earlier works on academic Chinese Marxism and his later critique of postcolonialism may shed light on both fields.
Editor:
Abingdon: Routledge
Idioma:
Inglês;Chinês
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Resultado
1
Avançar
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript