skip to main content
Idioma:
Tipo de recurso Mostra resultados com: Mostra resultados com: Índice

FEA of Peri‐Implant Stresses in Fixed Partial Denture Prostheses with Cantilevers

Alencar, Suyá Moura Mendes ; Nogueira, Lorenna Bastos Lima Verde ; Moura, Walter ; Rubo, José Henrique ; Silva, Thalisson ; Martins, Gregorio Antonio Soares ; Moura, Carmem Dolores Vilarinho Soares

Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-02, Vol.26 (2), p.150-155 [Periódico revisado por pares]

United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Texto completo disponível

Citações Citado por
  • Título:
    FEA of Peri‐Implant Stresses in Fixed Partial Denture Prostheses with Cantilevers
  • Autor: Alencar, Suyá Moura Mendes ; Nogueira, Lorenna Bastos Lima Verde ; Moura, Walter ; Rubo, José Henrique ; Silva, Thalisson ; Martins, Gregorio Antonio Soares ; Moura, Carmem Dolores Vilarinho Soares
  • Assuntos: Biomechanical Phenomena ; Bone Screws ; Cementation ; Computer Simulation ; dental implants ; dental prosthesis ; Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported ; Dental Stress Analysis - methods ; Dentistry ; Denture, Partial, Fixed ; Finite Element Analysis ; Humans ; Software ; Stress, Mechanical ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed
  • É parte de: Journal of prosthodontics, 2017-02, Vol.26 (2), p.150-155
  • Notas: .
    The authors deny any conflicts of interest
    ObjectType-Article-1
    SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
    ObjectType-Feature-2
    content type line 23
  • Descrição: Purpose To compare stresses in the peri‐implant bone produced by fixed partial prostheses with mesial and distal cantilevers, when cemented or screwed onto implants. Materials and Methods The experimental design consisted of four 3D models obtained by volumetric computerized tomography and analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA). Stresses were simulated in two stages. Stage 1 consisted of application of the preload. A 288 N load was applied to pillar screws of the cemented prosthesis, resulting in 389 MPa peak; 257 N was applied to the intermediate screw (multi‐unit) resulting in 390 MPa peak; and 111 N was applied to the prosthesis infrastructure screw in the screwed prostheses, resulting in 390 MPa peak. In stage 2, the axial and oblique loads were applied. The axial load consisted of 50 N for molar implants and 30 N for premolar implants. The oblique load (on the buccal slope of the buccal cusp of each crown) consisted of 30 N for premolar implants and 50 N for molar implants, with a buccolingual vector at a 45° angle with the occlusal plane. The response variables were the axial and oblique stresses on the peri‐implant bone, according to the following groups: group 1—models of fixed partial prostheses cemented onto implants with mesial or distal cantilevers; group 2—models of fixed partial denture screwed onto implants with mesial or distal cantilevers. Data were recorded, evaluated, and compared. Results Oblique loads produced higher peak values than axial loads, and were located at the bone crest of the implant closest to the cantilever, regardless of the prosthesis type. In the cemented prosthesis models, oblique loads produced the highest peaks in the primary implant region when compared with the screwed prosthesis models. Conclusion The screwed fixed prostheses caused less stress on peri‐implant bone regardless of whether the cantilever was located mesially or distally.
  • Editor: United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
  • Idioma: Inglês
Links
Voltar para lista de resultados
Ir para página anteriorAnterior Resultado  4 AvançarIr para próxima página

  • Realização: ABCD-USP USP   Logos de Redes Sociais: Freepik

Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.