skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
Search in:
Selecione a lista para navegar
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Por título
Por assunto
Por autor
Browse vid input
Busca Simples
This feature requires javascript
The construction of the ‘right’ multilingual learner-citizen in scientific and institutional discourses on CLIL
Staquet, Caroline
2021
Texto completo disponível
Citações
Citado por
Exibir Online
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Mais Opções
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
The construction of the ‘right’ multilingual learner-citizen in scientific and institutional discourses on CLIL
Autor:
Staquet, Caroline
Assuntos:
CLIL
;
inclusion
;
international organizations
;
language ideologies
;
language learning
;
language policy
;
Languages and Literatures
;
multilingualism
;
scientific discourses
;
Steunpunt Diversiteit & Leren
Notas:
Sociolinguistics Symposium 23 (e-SS23), Abstracts
Descrição:
This paper aims to analyse the learner personality which major scientific and institutional discourses on CLIL construct. Since the mid-nineties, CLIL has been promoted under the auspices of the EU as the ideal educational solution for the fabrication of multilingual citizens for Europe’s ‘Knowledge Society’. Similarly, an extensive body of research has credited CLIL with numerous extralinguistic benefits (e.g. enhancing pupils’ future employability). Yet, critics have recently pointed to the obfuscation of sensitive issues in CLIL literature, notably the (un)desired pupil-selection in CLIL tracks and the use of CLIL to promote solely prestigious languages (Sierens & Van Avermaet 2014). In this paper, I critically show that CLIL has not been egalitarian from its very inception. To do so, I analyse a key hybrid document on CLIL, i.e. the Marsh (2002) Report. This EU-funded report was authored by the founding father of CLIL, David Marsh. Since 2002, the report has been abundantly quoted and validated as a scientific source in CLIL literature. Firstly, I unveil how the report covertly constructs certain selective learner characteristics as prerequisites for future CLIL learners, despite its claim that CLIL is egalitarian. Secondly, I unravel the linguistic capital which the report constructs as the ‘right’ repertoire to equip CLIL learners with. In my conclusions, I discuss how uncritical valorizations of multilingualism in applied linguistics contribute to conveying institutional language ideologies, hence legitimizing social inequalities in late modernity.
Data de criação/publicação:
2021
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View record in Ghent University$$FView record in $$GGhent University
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
Anterior
Resultado
8
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript