skip to main content
Visitante
Meu Espaço
Minha Conta
Sair
Identificação
This feature requires javascript
Tags
Revistas Eletrônicas (eJournals)
Livros Eletrônicos (eBooks)
Bases de Dados
Bibliotecas USP
Ajuda
Ajuda
Idioma:
Inglês
Espanhol
Português
This feature required javascript
This feature requires javascript
Primo Search
Busca Geral
Busca Geral
Acervo Físico
Acervo Físico
Produção Intelectual da USP
Produção USP
Search For:
Clear Search Box
Search in:
Busca Geral
Or hit Enter to replace search target
Or select another collection:
Search in:
Busca Geral
Busca Avançada
Busca por Índices
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Structures and processes in spontaneous ADR reporting systems: a comparative study of Australia and Denmark
Aagaard, Lise ; Stenver, Doris Irene ; Hansen, Ebba Holme
Pharmacy world and science, 2008-10, Vol.30 (5), p.563-570
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
Sem texto completo
Citações
Citado por
Serviços
Detalhes
Resenhas & Tags
Nº de Citações
This feature requires javascript
Enviar para
Adicionar ao Meu Espaço
Remover do Meu Espaço
E-mail (máximo 30 registros por vez)
Imprimir
Link permanente
Referência
EasyBib
EndNote
RefWorks
del.icio.us
Exportar RIS
Exportar BibTeX
This feature requires javascript
Título:
Structures and processes in spontaneous ADR reporting systems: a comparative study of Australia and Denmark
Autor:
Aagaard, Lise
;
Stenver, Doris Irene
;
Hansen, Ebba Holme
Assuntos:
Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems - organization & administration
;
Australia
;
Comparative studies
;
Cross cultural studies
;
Denmark
;
Drug Industry - organization & administration
;
Humans
;
Information Dissemination - methods
;
Internal Medicine
;
Medicine
;
Medicine & Public Health
;
Models, Organizational
;
Outsourced Services - organization & administration
;
Pharmacology
;
Pharmacy
;
Public health
;
Research Article
;
Side effects
É parte de:
Pharmacy world and science, 2008-10, Vol.30 (5), p.563-570
Notas:
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
Descrição:
Objective To explore the organisational structure and processes of the Danish and Australian spontaneous ADR reporting systems with a view to how information is generated about new ADRs. Setting The Danish and Australian spontaneous ADR reporting systems. Method Qualitative analyses of documentary material, descriptive interviews with key informants, and observations were made. We analysed the organisational structure of the Danish and Australian ADR reporting systems with respect to structures and processes, including information flow and exchange of ADR data. The analysis was made based on Scott’s adapted version of Leavitt’s diamond model, with the components: goals/tasks, social structure, technology and participants, within a surrounding environment. Results The main differences between the systems were: (1) Participants : Outsourcing of ADR assessments to the pharmaceutical companies complicates maintenance of scientific skills within the Danish Medicines Agency (DKMA), as it leaves the handling of spontaneous ADR reports purely administrative within the DKMA, and the knowledge creation process remains with the pharmaceutical companies, while in Australia senior scientific staff work with evaluation of the ADR report; (2) Goals/tasks : In Denmark, resources are targeted at evaluating Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR) submitted by the companies, while the resources in Australia are focused on single case assessment resulting in faster and more proactive medicine surveillance; (3) Social structure : Discussions between scientific staff about ADRs take place in Australia, while the Danish system primarily focuses on entering and forwarding ADR data to the relevant pharmaceutical companies; (4) Technology : The Danish system exchanges ADR data electronically with pharmaceutical companies and the other EU countries, while Australia does not have a system for electronic exchange of ADR data; and (5) Environment : The Danish ADR system is embedded in the routines of cooperation within European pharmacovigilance network while the Australian system is acting alone, although they communicate with other systems. Conclusion The two systems differ with regard to reporting requirements, report handling, resources being spent and information exchange with the environment. In Denmark, learning about ADRs primarily takes place in the safety divisions of the pharmaceutical companies and the authorities have no control over the knowledge creation process. In Australia, more learning and control of the knowledge is present than in Denmark.
Editor:
Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands
Idioma:
Inglês
Links
View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Voltar para lista de resultados
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript
Buscando em bases de dados remotas. Favor aguardar.
Buscando por
em
scope:(USP_VIDEOS),scope:("PRIMO"),scope:(USP_FISICO),scope:(USP_EREVISTAS),scope:(USP),scope:(USP_EBOOKS),scope:(USP_PRODUCAO),primo_central_multiple_fe
Mostrar o que foi encontrado até o momento
This feature requires javascript
This feature requires javascript